Skip navigation

ChatGPT and co-constructed learning: postgraduate perspectives on using Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education at a Third-Culture University

ChatGPT and co-constructed learning: postgraduate perspectives on using Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education at a Third-Culture University

Day, Michael ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9612-2595 (2026) ChatGPT and co-constructed learning: postgraduate perspectives on using Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education at a Third-Culture University. Journal of ICT and Education (JICTE), 1 (1). pp. 43-60. (doi:10.69739/jicte.v1i1.1626)

[thumbnail of Open Access Article]
Preview
PDF (Open Access Article)
52818 DAY_ChatGPT_And_Co-Constructed_Learning_(OA)_2026.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (467kB) | Preview

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping teaching and learning in higher education (HE), yet its educational meaning is context-dependent. This article reports part of a study of Chinese postgraduate perspectives on generative AI (GenAI), with a specific focus on ChatGPT as a learning technology in an English Medium Instruction (EMI) transnational setting. A mixed-methods study generated insight from 103 postgraduate students at a UK joint-venture university in China, indicating that students positioned ChatGPT as a learning assistant rather than a substitute for learning. Meanwhile, they expressed acute awareness of ChatGPT’s academic reliability and accuracy, emphasising the need for verification practices and boundaries between legitimate learning support and inappropriate substitution. Interpreted through the lens of Third Culture Universities (TCUs), an idea describing complex and evolving international campuses, the findings illustrate how GenAI becomes deeply embedded within a learning ecology shaped by imported academic norms, EMI demands, technology, and transnational quality assurance. Rather than advocating prohibition, the study highlights the need for curriculum-integrated guidance, staff development, and explicit AI literacy teaching. It concludes by proposing a curriculum-centred approach that foregrounds responsible use, transparency, and verification as core learning outcomes in the GenAI era.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Journal is newly established. ISSN not yet assigned or published by the publisher at time of deposit (checked April 2026).
Uncontrolled Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, China, Higher Education, learning, teaching
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Professional Workforce Development
Information & Library Services
Last Modified: 13 Apr 2026 10:31
URI: https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/52818

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics