Skip navigation

A university should be a place open to the exchange of ideas, not one of censorship": Balancing equity, diversity, and inclusion and free speech in academia

A university should be a place open to the exchange of ideas, not one of censorship": Balancing equity, diversity, and inclusion and free speech in academia

Miller, Denise A. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9947-0616, Kosek, Agnes and Morgan, Robert ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7891-2662 (2025) A university should be a place open to the exchange of ideas, not one of censorship": Balancing equity, diversity, and inclusion and free speech in academia. Equity in Education and Society. ISSN 2752-6461 (Online) (doi:10.1177/27526461251371312)

[thumbnail of Open Access Article]
Preview
PDF (Open Access Article)
50847 MILLER_A_University_Should_Be_A_Place_Open_To_The_Exchange_Of_Ideas_Not_One_Of_Censorship_(OA)_2025.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (598kB) | Preview

Abstract

This study investigates how political ideologies influence university students’ perceptions of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) discussions at a Post-92 university in the United Kingdom. In light of the increasingly contested nature of EDI within higher education, the study critically examines how political beliefs influence students’ engagement with these initiatives. This study reports on qualitative data gathered through open-ended survey responses from 224 students and analysed using Thematic Analysis and Critical Discourse Analysis. The findings identified four key themes: (1) student perceptions of university-led discussions on discrimination and EDI, (2) the impact of perceived bias on free speech and engagement, (3) discomfort among students with non-left-wing political views, and (4) scepticism regarding the university’s commitment to EDI. While some students valued the university’s proactive efforts in promoting EDI, others perceived these initiatives as ideologically biased and limiting to open discourse. Notably, conservative and right-leaning students reported feelings of alienation, citing concerns about ideological bias and a lack of academic neutrality. Scepticism also emerged about the sincerity of EDI efforts, with some students viewing them as performative rather than substantive. The study highlights the difficulties universities face in fostering EDI while upholding academic freedom of speech and embracing ideological diversity.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Special Issue: Race, Riots & Education.
Uncontrolled Keywords: university, censorship, free speech, academia
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
L Education > L Education (General)
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Inequalities
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Education (EDU)
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Last Modified: 26 Aug 2025 13:35
URI: https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/50847

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics