Skip navigation

Expect the unexpected: investigating co-creation projects in a Living Lab

Expect the unexpected: investigating co-creation projects in a Living Lab

De Vita, Katharina ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5030-5588 and De Vita, Riccardo (2021) Expect the unexpected: investigating co-creation projects in a Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11 (9):10. pp. 6-20. ISSN 1927-0321 (doi:10.22215/timreview/1461)

[thumbnail of AAM]
Preview
PDF (AAM)
35449_K_DE_VITA_Expect_the_unexpected.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (572kB) | Preview

Abstract

Living Labs (LLs) are complex multi-stakeholder environments that enable real-life testing and experimentation of products, services, and systems. Despite increasing attention by practitioners as well as policymakers, and growing scholarly interest in the field, the literature exploring congruency between organisational objectives and outcomes when utilising LLs is still scarce. To fill this gap, a qualitative case study is employed to gain an in-depth understanding of objectives and project outcomes of organisations utilising LLs. The LLJOSEPHS® was chosen as this study’s empirical context, in which 14 different projects were analysed. In-depth interviews revealed eight categories of measurable project outcomes: market acceptance, price acceptability, exposure, product testing, market intelligence, legitimisation, method testing, and networking. This study not only highlights what companies have achieved in comparison to their original project objectives, but also identifies additional unplanned outcomes that they accomplished. The findings offer important project-level insights into the potential and limitations of LLs. The results form a basis upon which to develop a better understanding of how innovation performance can be nurtured in LLs. Insights from the study may also help firms and facilitators by providing a deeper understanding of LLs at an individual project-level, and by articulating potential objectives and outcomes associated with organisations’ involvement in LLs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: co-creation; innovation; innovation management; living lab; open innovation
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
T Technology > T Technology (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Business
Faculty of Business > Department of Human Resources & Organisational Behaviour
Faculty of Business > Department of Systems Management & Strategy
Faculty of Business > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC)
Faculty of Business > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC) > Centre for Business Network Analysis (CBNA)
Faculty of Business > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC) > Connected Cities Research Group
Greenwich Business School > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC)
Last Modified: 02 Dec 2024 15:55
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/35449

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics