Estimation of peak vertical velocity and relative load changes by subjective measures in weightlifting movements
    
    Chapman, Mark, Tomkins, Samuel, Triplett, Travis N, Larumbe-Zabala, Eneko and Naclerio, Fernando ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7405-4894
  
(2021)
Estimation of peak vertical velocity and relative load changes by subjective measures in weightlifting movements.
    Biology of Sport, 39 (3).
     pp. 639-646.
     ISSN 0860-021X (Print), 2083-1862 (Online)
  
  
	 (doi:10.5114/biolsport.2022.106156)
  
| Preview | PDF (Open Access Article) 32806 NACLERIO_Estimation_Of_Vertical_Velocity_And_Relative_Load_Changes_(OA)_2021.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike. Download (381kB) | Preview | 
| Preview | PDF (Author's Accepted Manuscript) 32806 NACLERIO_Estimation_Of_Vertical_Velocity_And_Relative_Load_Changes_(AAM)_2021.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB) | Preview | 
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the ability of the OMNI-RES (0-10) scale to estimate velocity and loading changes during sets to failure in the hang power clean (HPC) exercise.
Material and Methods: Eleven recreationally resistance-trained males (28.5±3.5 years) with an average onerepetition maximum (1RM) value of 1.1±0.07 kg body mass-1 in HPC, were assessed on five separate days with 48 hours of rest between sessions. After determining the 1RM value, participants performed four sets to self-determined failure with the following relative load ranges: 60%<70%, 70<80%, 80<90% and >90%. The peak vertical velocity (PVV), and Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) were measured for every repetition of each set.
Results: The RPE expressed after the first repetition (RPE-1) and when the highest value of PVV was achieved during the set (RPE-max) were similar and significantly lower than the RPE associated with a 5% (RPE-5%) and 10% (RPE-10%) drop in PVV. In addition, the RPE produced at failure was similar to RPE-5% only for the heaviest range (≥90%). Furthermore, RPE-1 was useful to distinguish loading zones between the four assessed ranges (60<70, vs. 70<80%, vs. 80<90%, vs. ≥90%).
Conclusions: The RPE seems to be useful to identify PVV changes (maximal, 5% and 10% drop) during continuous sets to self-determined failure and to distinguish 10% loading zone increments, from 60 to 100% of 1RM in the HPC.
| Item Type: | Article | 
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | OMNI-RES (0-10) scale, perceived exertion, hang power clean, velocity-based training | 
| Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) Q Science > Q Science (General) Q Science > QP Physiology | 
| Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: | Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM) | 
| Last Modified: | 09 Jan 2024 15:50 | 
| URI: | http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/32806 | 
Actions (login required)
|  | View Item | 
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
 Tools
 Tools Tools
 Tools