"I’m managed by a White man who’s managed by a White man who’s managed by a White woman who’s managed by a White man": the problem of institutional racism in a UK-based university
Miller, Denise A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9947-0616, Essex, Ryan
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3497-3137 and Brown, Charmaine
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6471-9706
(2025)
"I’m managed by a White man who’s managed by a White man who’s managed by a White woman who’s managed by a White man": the problem of institutional racism in a UK-based university.
London Review of Education (LRE), 23 (1):8.
pp. 1-13.
ISSN 1474-8460 (Print), 1474-8479 (Online)
(doi:10.14324/LRE.23.1.08)
Preview |
PDF (Open Access Article)
50154 MILLER_I_m_Managed_By_A_White_Man_Who_s_Managed_By_A_White_Man_Who_s_Managed_By_A_White_Woman_Who_s_Managed_By_A_White_Man_(OA)_2025.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (287kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Despite extensive research on institutional racism in UK universities, major gaps remain in understanding the contrasting experiences of Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) and White staff across all levels of higher education. This study addresses that gap by exploring the lived experiences of 18 staff members at a post-1992 university, drawing on Braun and Clarke’s six-step thematic analysis alongside critical race theory. Four key themes emerged: ‘White privilege’, ‘Discrimination and exclusion’, ‘Impact on self-perception and behaviour’, and a striking, verbatim-titled theme from a White participant (also the title of this article): ‘I’m managed by a White man who’s managed by a White man who’s managed by a White woman who’s managed by a White man’. Findings expose the deeply embedded nature of racism within the institution, evident in exclusionary practices, unequal career progression and the persistence of White privilege. Both BAME and White participants emphasised the urgent need for real change, and they called for greater accountability, transparency, and diversification of leadership. This study contributes to a broader understanding of institutional inequality and aligns with several United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It supports SDG 4 (Quality Education) by exposing the inequities embedded within academic environments; SDG 5 (Gender Equality) by addressing intersecting forms of discrimination; SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) through its critique of barriers to fair progression; SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) by calling for systemic reform; and SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) by promoting inclusive, accountable, and transparent institutional practices.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | higher education, university, staff, institutional racism, critical race theory |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) L Education > L Education (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education |
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: | Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Inequalities Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Education (EDU) Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM) |
Last Modified: | 09 Apr 2025 13:24 |
URI: | http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/50154 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year