Skip navigation

The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a Higher Education context

The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a Higher Education context

Kofinas, Alexander K., Tsay, Crystal Han-Huei ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4959-0411 and Pike, David (2025) The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a Higher Education context. British Journal of Educational Technology (BJET). ISSN 0007-1013 (Print), 1467-8535 (Online) (In Press)

[thumbnail of Author's Accepted Manuscript] PDF (Author's Accepted Manuscript)
50077 TSAY_The_Impact_Of_Generative_AI_On_Academic_Integrity_Of_Authentic_Assessments_Within_A_Higher_Education_Context_(AAM)_2025.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (892kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Generative AI (hereinafter GenAI) technology, such as ChatGPT, is already influencing the higher education sector. In this work, we focused on the impact of GenAI on the academic integrity of assessments within higher education institutions, as GenAI can be used to circumvent assessment approaches within the sector, compromising their quality. The purpose of our research was threefold: first, to determine the extent to which the use of GenAI can be detected via the marking and moderation process; second, to understand whether the presence of GenAI affects the marking process; and finally, to establish whether authentic assessments can safeguard academic integrity. We used a series of experiments in the context of two UK-based universities to examine these issues. Our findings indicate that markers, in general, are not able to distinguish assessments that have had GenAI input from assessments that did not, even though the presence of GenAI affects the way markers approach the marking process. Our findings also suggest that the level of authenticity in an assessment has no impact on the ability to safeguard against or detect GenAI usage in assessment creation. In conclusion, we suggest that current approaches to assessments in higher education are susceptible to GenAI manipulation and that the higher education sector cannot rely on authentic assessments alone to control the impact of GenAI on academic integrity. Thus, we recommend giving more critical attention to assessment design and placing more emphasis on assessments that rely on social experiential learning and are performative rather than output based and asynchronously written.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Generative AI, academic integrity, authentic assessments, experiment
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
T Technology > T Technology (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Greenwich Business School
Greenwich Business School > Executive Business Centre
Last Modified: 18 Mar 2025 09:27
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/50077

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics