Skip navigation

Mouse cursor trajectories capture the flexible adaptivity of predictive sentence processing

Mouse cursor trajectories capture the flexible adaptivity of predictive sentence processing

Kukona, A. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4377-3057 and Hasshim, N. (2024) Mouse cursor trajectories capture the flexible adaptivity of predictive sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. ISSN 0278-7393 (Print), 1939-1285 (Online) (doi:10.1037/xlm0001397)

[thumbnail of Author's Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author's Accepted Manuscript)
47667 BAKER-KUKONA_Mouse_Cursor_Trajectories_Capture_The_Flexible_Adaptivity_Of_Predictive_Sentence_Processing_(AAM)_2024.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (602kB) | Preview

Abstract

Recent psycholinguistic findings raise fundamental questions about comprehenders’ ability to rationally adapt their predictions during sentence processing. Two mouse cursor tracking experiments (each N = 85) assessed this adaptivity by manipulating the reliability of verb-based semantic cues. In Experiment 1, predictive mouse cursor movements to targets (e.g., bike) vs. distractors (e.g., kite) were measured while participants heard equal proportions of non-predictive (e.g., “spot … the bike”), predictive (e.g., “ride … the bike”) and anti-predictive (e.g., “fly … the bike”) sentences. In Experiment 2, participants heard equal proportions of non-predictive and anti-predictive sentences. Participants were observed to flexibly adapt their predictions, such that they disengaged prediction in Experiment 1 when verb-based cues were unreliable and as likely to be disconfirmed as confirmed, while they generated adapted predictions in Experiment 2 when verb-based cues were reliably disconfirmed. However, links to individual differences in cognitive control were not observed. These results are interpreted as supporting rational theoretical approaches.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptation, mouse cursor tracking, prediction, rationality, sentence processing
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Thinking and Learning
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Last Modified: 08 Oct 2024 15:16
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/47667

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics