Ros, Tomas, Enriquez-Geppert, Stefanie, Zotev, Vadim, Young, Kymberly D., Wood, Guilherme, Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan, Wan, Feng, Vuilleumier, Patrik, Vialatte, François, Van De Ville, Dimitri, Todder, Doron, Surmeli, Tanju, Sulzer, James S., Strehl, Ute, Sterman, Maurice Barry, Steiner, Naomi J., Sorger, Bettina, Soekadar, Surjo R., Sitaram, Ranganatha, Sherlin, Leslie H., Schönenberg, Michael, Scharnowski, Frank, Schabus, Manuel, Rubia, Katya, Agostinho, Rosa, Reiner, Miriam, Pineda, Jaime A., Paret, Christian, Ossadtchi, Alexei, Nicholson, Andrew A., Nan, Wenya, Minguez, Javier, Micoulaud-Franchi, Jean-Arthur, Mehler, David M.A., Lührs, Michael, Lubar, Joel, Lotte, Fabien, Linden, David E.J., Lewis-Peacock, Jarrod A., Lebedev, Mikhail A., Lanius, Ruth A., Kübler, Andrea, Kranczioch, Cornelia, Koush, Yury, Konicar, Lilian, Kohl, Simon H., Kober, Silivia E., Klados, Manousos A., Jeunet, Camille, Janssen, T. W. P., Huster, Rene J., Hoedlmoser, Kirsten, Hirshberg, Laurence M., Heunis, Stephan, Hendler, Talma, Hampson, Michelle, Guggisberg, Adrian G., Gruzelier, John H., Göbel, Rainer W., Gninenko, Nicolas, Gharabaghi, Alireza, Frewen, Paul, Fovet, Thomas, Fernández, Thalia, Escolano, Carlos, Ehlis, Ann-Christine, Drechsler, Renate, deCharms, Christopher R., Debener, Stefan, De Ridder, Dirk, Davelaar, Eddy J., Congedo, Marco, Cavazza, Marc ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6113-9696, Breteler, Marinus H.M., Brandeis, Daniel, Bodurka, Jerzy, Birbaumer, Niels, Bazanova, Olga M., Guggenberger, Robert, Barth, Beatrix, Bamidis, Panagiotis D., Auer, Tibor, Arns, Martijn and Thibault, Robert T. (2020) Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist). Brain, 143 (6). pp. 1674-1685. ISSN 0006-8950 (Print), 1460-2156 (Online) (doi:10.1093/brain/awaa009)

Preview

PDF (Publisher's Pre-Print) 27068 CAVAZZA_Consensus_on_the_Reporting_and_Experimental_Design_(OA)_2019.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (323kB) | Preview

Abstract

Neurofeedback has begun to attract the attention and scrutiny of the scientific and medical mainstream. Here, neurofeedback researchers present a consensus-derived checklist that aims to improve the reporting and experimental design standards in the field.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Uncontrolled Keywords:	neurofeedback, regulation, consensus, checklist, guidelines
Subjects:	R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Engineering & Science > School of Computing & Mathematical Sciences (CMS) Faculty of Engineering & Science
Last Modified:	04 Mar 2022 13:06
URI:	http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/27068

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads