Skip navigation

Black Lives Matter or All Lives Matter? Exploring the role of intergroup contact valence and intergroup threat in supporting the two movements

Black Lives Matter or All Lives Matter? Exploring the role of intergroup contact valence and intergroup threat in supporting the two movements

Stathi, Sofia ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-5239, Fortune, Vanessa ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6983-5979 and Smith, Rebecca ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6459-0084 (2026) Black Lives Matter or All Lives Matter? Exploring the role of intergroup contact valence and intergroup threat in supporting the two movements. The Journal of Social Psychology. ISSN 0022-4545 (Print), 1940-1183 (Online) (In Press)

[thumbnail of Author's Accepted Manuscript] PDF (Author's Accepted Manuscript)
54518 STATHI_Black_Lives_Matter_Or_All_Lives_Matter_(AAM)_2026.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (395kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement is often referred to as the civil rights movement of our time. With the rise of BLM, the alternative movement of All Lives Matter (ALM) developed as a counterforce. This study examined the role of valence of intergroup contact and of perceived realistic and symbolic threat in supporting BLM and ALM. A correlational study was carried out (N = 375), with predominantly British participants who self-identified as white. The results showed that support for the two movements was negatively related to one another. Positive contact with Black people was negatively associated with support for ALM over BLM; negative contact was associated positively with support for ALM over BLM. Both symbolic and realistic threat correlated with support for ALM over BLM. However, only symbolic threat emerged as a mediator explaining the relationship between contact and ALM over BLM support. This pattern of results remained even when controlling for political orientation. The results are discussed in the context of solidarity-based collective action and current approaches to understanding allyship.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Partial financial support was received from the Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, to conduct participant recruitment for this research.
Uncontrolled Keywords: intergroup contact, Black Lives Matter, All Lives Matter, intergroup threat, collective action, allyship
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Inequalities
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Last Modified: 29 Sep 2026 14:54
URI: https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/54518

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics