Skip navigation

Verification trials can create the illusion of V̇O2max in addition to contributing to confirming the attainment of V̇O2max

Verification trials can create the illusion of V̇O2max in addition to contributing to confirming the attainment of V̇O2max

Çabuk, Refik, Alp, Egemen, Murias, Juan Manuel and Karsten, Bettina ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7336-9472 (2026) Verification trials can create the illusion of V̇O2max in addition to contributing to confirming the attainment of V̇O2max. Scandinavian Journal Of Medicine and Science In Sports. ISSN 0905-7188 (Print), 1600-0838 (Online) (In Press)

[thumbnail of Author's Accepted Manuscript] PDF (Author's Accepted Manuscript)
52358 KARSTEN_Verification_Trials_Can_Create_The_Illusion_Of_V̇O2max_(AAM)_2026.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (434kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This study examined whether constant-workload verification trials performed at intensities below, at, and above the ramp-incremental peak mechanical power output (PPO) contribute to confirming maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max). Methods: Fifteen trained to well-trained male cyclists (V̇O2max: 63.6±5.6 mL·kg-1·min-1) completed maximal ramp testing followed by seven randomized verification trials (80–110% PPO at 5% intervals) on separate days. Differences in V̇O2 responses were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Effect size was calculated using Hedges’ g. The peak V̇O2 attained during the verification trials was expressed relative to the ramp-derived V̇O2max and classified as lower (<95%), within normal variability (95–105%), or higher (>105%). Results: The peak V̇O2 values at 80%, 105%, and 110% PPO were significantly lower than ramp-derived V̇O2max (p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were observed at 85%, 90%, and 95% PPO. Effect sizes were small at 85–95% PPO (Hedges’ g = 0.29–0.32), medium at 100–105% PPO (Hedges’ g = 0.63–0.66), and large at 80% and 110% PPO (Hedges’ g = 1.21–1.34). Of 105 verification trials, 83 were within ±5% of ramp V̇O2max, 20 were lower (mainly at 80% and 110% PPO), and two exceeded ramp V̇O2max (at 85% and 95% PPO). Conclusions: Although verification trials did not meaningfully contribute to the verification of V̇O2max, trials performed at 85–95% PPO provided the best chances of confirming V̇O2max in trained individuals. Interpretation of verification trials relative to ramp-derived PPO is protocol dependent, which may limit generalizability across different ramp designs.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: aerobic capacity, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, constant-workload trials, peak oxygen uptake, ramp-incremental test, severe-intensity domain
Subjects: Q Science > Q Science (General)
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Exercise Activity and Rehabilitation
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Last Modified: 30 Jan 2026 10:48
URI: https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/52358

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics