Lubaale, Emma Charlene (2025) The Defence of Duress: inconsistent International Criminal Court rulings and National Law guidance. Criminal Law Forum. pp. 1-34. ISSN 1046-8374 (Print), 1572-9850 (Online) (doi:10.1007/s10609-025-09517-2)

Preview

PDF (Open Access Article) 51072 LUBAALE_The_Defence_Of_Duress_Inconsistent_International_Criminal_Court_Rulings_(OA)_2025.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (285kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article explores how national law principles can address inconsistencies in the application of the defence of duress at the International Criminal Court (ICC). The Rome Statute is the first to codify this defence, but its application remains challenging. In Ongwen, both the Trial and Appeal Chambers rejected the defence due to a lack of imminent death or serious harm. Conversely, in Ag Mahmoud, Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua found the defence applicable, criticising its narrow interpretation in Ongwen. A restrictive interpretation risks rendering the defence meaningless, while an overly broad one could undermine the ICC's goal of avoiding impunity. Ongwen and Ag Mahmoud are examined, highlighting inconsistencies in interpreting the defence of duress. Drawing on general principles from selected legal systems, the article proposes an approach to balance accountability for serious crimes with a meaningful use of this defence by the ICC.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Duress, International Criminal Court, Defences
Subjects:	J Political Science > JX International law K Law > K Law (General) K Law > KZ Law of Nations
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Law, Arts and Social Sciences Faculty of Law, Arts and Social Sciences > School of Law and Criminology
Last Modified:	24 Sep 2025 13:30
URI:	https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/51072

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads