Skip navigation

Updated Illinois Rape Myth acceptance scale: an Item Response Theory analysis

Updated Illinois Rape Myth acceptance scale: an Item Response Theory analysis

Beckett, Nichola, Longpré, Nicholas and Stefanska, Ewa ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5685-0763 (2025) Updated Illinois Rape Myth acceptance scale: an Item Response Theory analysis. Journal of Sexual Aggression. ISSN 1355-2600 (Print), 1742-6545 (Online) (doi:10.1080/13552600.2025.2540632)

[thumbnail of Open Access Article]
Preview
PDF (Open Access Article)
51006 STEFANSKA_Updated_Illinois_Rape_Myth_Acceptance_Scale_(OA)_2025.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Many reasons have been proposed to explain why few sexual assaults are reported, including victim blaming attitudes. These attitudes are called Rape Myths and are used to move the blame from the perpetrators to the victim. The uIRMA is the most established rape myth acceptance measure. While the psychometric properties of the uIRMA are excellent, no studies have assessed the latent structure of the scale through Item Response Theory. Furthermore, there is a lack of knowledge on the psychometric properties of the uIRMA with non-binary individuals. Analyses were conducted on a sample of 1636 participants, composed of men, women and non-binary individuals. The uIRMA is discriminating adequately across genders and items. Furthermore, the difficulty level of corresponding items was lower for men than women and non-binary individuals, with men endorsing more Rape Myths at all levels. However, analyses revealed psychometric concerns with the use of the uIRMA among non-binary participants.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This article has earned the Center for Open Science badge for Open Materials. The materials are openly accessible at.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Rape Myths, Item Response Theory, victim blaming attitudes, sexual violence, gender differences, nonbinary individuals
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
K Law > K Law (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Last Modified: 08 Sep 2025 13:24
URI: https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/51006

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics