Skip navigation

Queerying Consent: Romantic relationship scripts, rape myths, and the ‘sex game gone wrong’

Queerying Consent: Romantic relationship scripts, rape myths, and the ‘sex game gone wrong’

Fanghanel, Alexandra ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4041-561X (2025) Queerying Consent: Romantic relationship scripts, rape myths, and the ‘sex game gone wrong’. Sexualities. ISSN 1363-4607 (Print), 1461-7382 (Online) (In Press)

[thumbnail of Author's Accepted Manuscript] PDF (Author's Accepted Manuscript)
50942 FANGHANEL_Queerying_Consent_Romantic_Relationship_Scripts_Rape_Myths_And_The_Sex_Game_Gone_Wrong_(AAM)_2025.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (326kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Consent is often positioned as the linchpin of sexual ethics and justice, framed within binary paradigms such as ‘yes means yes’ and ‘no means no’. However, this fails to account for the complexities of power dynamics, ambiguous desires, and the interplay of verbal and non-verbal communication in sexual encounters. This paper critically interrogates how consent is constructed and mobilised in legal cases involving ‘sex games gone wrong’, where claims of consensual rough sex are often used to mitigate or exonerate acts of violence in which women are killed or injured by men. It provides an innovative intervention into these debates framed around the potentialities of queer approaches to consent and sexual encounters. Through in-depth analyses of Crown Court case transcripts, the paper reveals how heteronormative romantic relationship scripts and rape myths underpin consent narratives, often privileging male perspectives while erasing or discrediting those of women. Significantly, the paper draws on queer and BDSM scholarship to propose a ‘queerying’ of consent: a deconstructive approach that unsettles traditional assumptions and embraces the ambiguity, imperfection, and intersubjectivity of consent. By challenging the legalistic and cultural orthodoxy of consent, this paper offers a more nuanced, ethics-driven framework that fosters sexual justice in both legal and socio-cultural contexts.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: heteronormativity, consent, queerness, rough sex, rape myths
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
K Law > K Law (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Law, Arts and Social Sciences
Faculty of Law, Arts and Social Sciences > Centre for Communities and Social Justice
Faculty of Law, Arts and Social Sciences > School of Law and Criminology
Last Modified: 13 Aug 2025 10:38
URI: https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/50924

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics