Skip navigation

Whose ‘voice’ is it anyway? The paradoxes of the participatory narrative

Whose ‘voice’ is it anyway? The paradoxes of the participatory narrative

Papadopoulou, Marianna and Sidorenko, Ewa (2021) Whose ‘voice’ is it anyway? The paradoxes of the participatory narrative. British Educational Research Journal (BERA). ISSN 0141-1926 (Print), 1469-3518 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3770)

[img] PDF (Author's published manuscript)
34766_SIDORENKO_Whose _voice _is_it_anyway.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 February 2023.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (119kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This study discusses some of the paradoxes found in the rhetoric of participatory research. Research-with-children views them as competent and agentic and as social actors, as citizens with opinions that must be listened to and given due weight. This image of the child as a social actor fails to acknowledge the structural, contextual and relational conditions that can afford or restrict opportunities for children’s agentic action. It conceals the multi-faceted, multi-dimensional properties of power that shape children’s (and adults’) contributions and ‘voices’. Our research took place in a primary school and aimed at training Year 6 children to carry out their own research on their chosen topic of interest. The participatory research ‘space’ was informed by the participants’ different intentionalities and agendas. The children were invited to take initiatives and make decisions, to be agentic. However, their agency, or what counts as ‘proper’ agency, was framed and defined in our adult terms. Tensions arose when the children’s agendas conflicted with and threatened ours. As we argue here, this participatory space should rather be seen as a political arena, where different and often competing agendas are at play, where the roles and relationships between children and adults are far from fixed, and where the capacity for agentic action is always socially mediated and shaped by social structure.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: agency and structure; agendas; children’s voices; dimensions of power; intentionalities; participatory narrative
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1501 Primary Education
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Education (EDU)
Related URLs:
Last Modified: 17 May 2022 09:41
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/34766

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics