Skip navigation

Relationship between the critical power test and a 20-min functional threshold power test in cycling

Relationship between the critical power test and a 20-min functional threshold power test in cycling

Karsten, Bettina ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7336-9472, Petrigna, Luca, Klose, Andreas, Bianco, Antonino, Townsend, Nathan and Triska, Christoph (2021) Relationship between the critical power test and a 20-min functional threshold power test in cycling. Frontiers in Physiology, 11. pp. 373-382. ISSN 1664-042X (Online) (doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.613151)

[thumbnail of Open Access Article]
Preview
PDF (Open Access Article)
50489 KARSTEN_Relationship_Between_The_Critical_Power_Test_And_A_20-Min_Functional_Threshold_Power_Test_In_Cycling_(OA)_2021.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (400kB) | Preview

Abstract

To investigate the agreement between critical power (CP) and functional threshold power (FTP), 17 trained cyclists and triathletes (mean ± SD: age 31 ± 9 years, body mass 80 ± 10 kg, maximal aerobic power 350 ± 56 W, peak oxygen consumption 51 ± 10 mL·min−1·kg−1) performed a maximal incremental ramp test, a single-visit CP test and a 20-min time trial (TT) test in randomized order on three different days. CP was determined using a time-trial (TT) protocol of three durations (12, 7, and 3 min) interspersed by 30 min passive rest. FTP was calculated as 95% of 20-min mean power achieved during the TT. Differences between means were examined using magnitude-based inferences and a paired-samples t-test. Effect sizes are reported as Cohen’s d. Agreement between CP and FTP was assessed using the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) method and Pearson correlation coefficient. There was a 91.7% probability that CP (256 ± 50 W) was higher than FTP (249 ± 44 W). Indeed, CP was significantly higher compared to FTP (P = 0.041) which was associated with a trivial effect size (d = 0.04). The mean bias between CP and FTP was 7 ± 13 W and LoA were −19 to 33 W. Even though strong correlations exist between CP and FTP (r = 0.969; P < 0.001), the chance of meaningful differences in terms of performance (1% smallest worthwhile change), were greater than 90%. With relatively large ranges for LoA between variables, these values generally should not be used interchangeably. Caution should consequently be exercised when choosing between FTP and CP for the purposes of performance analysis.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: power-duration relationship, exercise tolerance, fatigue threshold, cycling performance, functional threshold power threshold power
Subjects: Q Science > QP Physiology
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Exercise Activity and Rehabilitation
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Last Modified: 21 May 2025 13:41
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/50489

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics