Relationship between the critical power test and a 20-min functional threshold power test in cycling
Karsten, Bettina ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7336-9472, Petrigna, Luca, Klose, Andreas, Bianco, Antonino, Townsend, Nathan and Triska, Christoph
(2021)
Relationship between the critical power test and a 20-min functional threshold power test in cycling.
Frontiers in Physiology, 11.
pp. 373-382.
ISSN 1664-042X (Online)
(doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.613151)
Preview |
PDF (Open Access Article)
50489 KARSTEN_Relationship_Between_The_Critical_Power_Test_And_A_20-Min_Functional_Threshold_Power_Test_In_Cycling_(OA)_2021.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (400kB) | Preview |
Abstract
To investigate the agreement between critical power (CP) and functional threshold power (FTP), 17 trained cyclists and triathletes (mean ± SD: age 31 ± 9 years, body mass 80 ± 10 kg, maximal aerobic power 350 ± 56 W, peak oxygen consumption 51 ± 10 mL·min−1·kg−1) performed a maximal incremental ramp test, a single-visit CP test and a 20-min time trial (TT) test in randomized order on three different days. CP was determined using a time-trial (TT) protocol of three durations (12, 7, and 3 min) interspersed by 30 min passive rest. FTP was calculated as 95% of 20-min mean power achieved during the TT. Differences between means were examined using magnitude-based inferences and a paired-samples t-test. Effect sizes are reported as Cohen’s d. Agreement between CP and FTP was assessed using the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) method and Pearson correlation coefficient. There was a 91.7% probability that CP (256 ± 50 W) was higher than FTP (249 ± 44 W). Indeed, CP was significantly higher compared to FTP (P = 0.041) which was associated with a trivial effect size (d = 0.04). The mean bias between CP and FTP was 7 ± 13 W and LoA were −19 to 33 W. Even though strong correlations exist between CP and FTP (r = 0.969; P < 0.001), the chance of meaningful differences in terms of performance (1% smallest worthwhile change), were greater than 90%. With relatively large ranges for LoA between variables, these values generally should not be used interchangeably. Caution should consequently be exercised when choosing between FTP and CP for the purposes of performance analysis.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | power-duration relationship, exercise tolerance, fatigue threshold, cycling performance, functional threshold power threshold power |
Subjects: | Q Science > QP Physiology R Medicine > R Medicine (General) R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC1200 Sports Medicine |
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: | Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Exercise Activity and Rehabilitation Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM) |
Last Modified: | 21 May 2025 13:41 |
URI: | http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/50489 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year