Skip navigation

How prototypical are we compared to Them? The role of the Group Relative Prototypicality in explaining the path from intergroup contact to collective action

How prototypical are we compared to Them? The role of the Group Relative Prototypicality in explaining the path from intergroup contact to collective action

Cocco, Veronica Margherita, Stathi, Sofia ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-5239, Lucarini, Alice, Keshavarzi, Saeed, Ruhani, Ali, Ebrahimi, Fateme and Vezzali, Loris (2025) How prototypical are we compared to Them? The role of the Group Relative Prototypicality in explaining the path from intergroup contact to collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology. ISSN 0144-6665 (Print), 2044-8309 (Online) (In Press)

[thumbnail of Author's Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author's Accepted Manuscript)
49419 STATHI_How_Prototypical_Are_We_Compared_To_Them_The_Role_Of_The_Group_Relative_Prototypicality_(AAM)_2025.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (410kB) | Preview

Abstract

In two cross-sectional and two experimental studies across both advantaged and disadvantaged group members (Ntotal = 1,980 from two national contexts, UK and Italy),we explored if perceptions of group relative prototypicality may explain the association of positive and negative contact with collective action. Specifically, across studies, we investigated subgroup relative prototypicality with respect to four different common identities (national, supranational, based on humanity, humanity values). In Studies 1-2, among advantaged group members, positive contact was positively associated with collective action intentions via greater relative prototypicality of disadvantaged groups; in Study 2, we also found that negative contact was negatively associated with collective action intentions via decreased relative prototypicality of disadvantaged groups. By contrast, among disadvantaged group members, relative prototypicality did not exert any mediation effects. Experimental Studies 3-4 using advantaged group member participants generally provided causal evidence that positive (imagined) contact increases relative prototypicality of the disadvantaged group (Study 3), and that relative prototypicality increases collective action (Study 4).

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: intergroup contact, self-categorization theory, common identity, prototypicality, solidarity-based collective action
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Inequalities
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Last Modified: 20 Jan 2025 16:43
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/49419

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics