Yoshida, Yuki, Sitas, Nadia, Mannetti, Lelani, O'Farrell, Patrick, Arroyo-Robles, Gabriela, Berbés-Blázquez, Marta, González-Jiménez, David, Nelson, Valerie ORCID: 0000-0003-1075-0238 , Niamir, Aidin and Harmáčková, Zuzana V. (2024) Beyond Academia: a case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research. Environmental Science and Policy, 162:103882. ISSN 1462-9011 (Print), 1873-6416 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103882)

Preview

PDF (Open Access Article) 48670 NELSON_Beyond_Academia_A_Case_For_Reviews_Of_Gray_Literature_For_Science-Policy_Processes_And_Applied_Research_(OA)_2024.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (5MB) | Preview

Abstract

Gray literature is increasingly considered to complement evidence and knowledge from peer-reviewed literature for science-policy processes and applied research. On the one hand, science-policy assessments need to consider a diversity of worldviews, knowledge types and values from a variety of sectors and actor groups, and synthesize policy-relevant findings that are salient, legitimate and credible. On the other hand, practitioners and scholars conducting applied research are affected by the time lag and biases of academic publication processes. Gray literature holds diverse perspectives informative for science-policy processes as well as practical evidence unfiltered by commercial publication processes. However, its heterogeneity has made it challenging to access through conventional means for a literature review. This paper details one endeavor within the Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) to review gray literature using Google’s Programmable Search Engine. In the absence of a standardized approach, we build on the limited experiential knowledge base for reviewing gray literature and report on the potential applicability of our strategy for future reviews. Gray literature review results contrast findings of our parallel review of academic literature, underlining the importance of mobilizing different knowledge bases in science-policy assessments, evidence-based practices, and applied research.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	gray literature, diverse forms of knowledge, sustainability, evidence
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) L Education > L Education (General) Q Science > Q Science (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Engineering & Science Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Centre for Society, Environment and Development (CSED) Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Centre for Society, Environment and Development (CSED) > Political Ecology, Culture & Arts
Last Modified:	21 Nov 2024 12:07
URI:	http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/48670

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads