Skip navigation

The healthy start scheme in england “is a lifeline for families but many are missing out”: a rapid qualitative analysis

The healthy start scheme in england “is a lifeline for families but many are missing out”: a rapid qualitative analysis

Barrett, Millie, Spires, Mark ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1767-2511 and Vogel, Christina (2024) The healthy start scheme in england “is a lifeline for families but many are missing out”: a rapid qualitative analysis. BMC Medicine, 22:177. ISSN 1741-7015 (Online) (doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03380-5)

[thumbnail of Open Access Article]
Preview
PDF (Open Access Article)
48395 SPIRES_The_Healthy_Start_Scheme_in_England_(OA)_2024.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Author's Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author's Accepted Manuscript)
48395 SPIRES_The_Healthy_Start_Scheme_in_England_(AAM)_2024.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background
Healthy Start (HS) is a government scheme in England, Wales and Northern Ireland that offers a financial payment card and free vitamins to families experiencing low income. Pregnant women and families with children < 4 years can use the HS card to buy fruit, vegetables, cow’s milk, infant formula and pulses. HS was fully digitalised in March 2022. While digitalisation has improved the user experience for many families, in the context of the cost-of-living crisis and increasing dietary inequalities, it is important to understand why HS is not reaching more families. This study aimed to (i) assess the perceptions and experiences of HS from stakeholders across the system including those who promote, implement and are eligible for HS, and (ii) identify recommendations to improve the scheme’s effectiveness and uptake.

Methods
The study design was a post-implementation rapid qualitative evaluation using stakeholder interviews. Data were collected between January and June 2023 via semi‐structured interviews (50% online; 50% in person) with 112 stakeholders, including parents (n = 59), non‐government organisations (n = 13), retailers (n = 11) and health and community professionals (n = 29) at national and local levels. Findings were confirmed by a sub-sample of participants.

Results
Six core themes cut across stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences, and stakeholders collectively outlined seven recommendations they felt could be acted upon to maximise uptake and efficiency of HS, with actions at both national and local levels. A novel finding from this study is that raising awareness about HS alone is unlikely to result automatically or universally in higher uptake rate. Recommendations include: continuing to provide this scheme that is universally valued; the need for many families to be provided with a helping hand to successfully complete the application; reframing of the scheme as a child’s right to food and development to ensure inclusivity; improved leadership, coordination and accountability at both national and local levels.

Conclusions
HS provides benefits for child development and family wellbeing. The study’s recommendations should be actioned by national and local governments to enable all families eligible for the scheme to benefit from this nutritional safety net.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: food subsidy programme, healthy start, rapid qualitative analysis, systems approach, dietary inequalities
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Centre for Food Systems Research
Last Modified: 24 Oct 2024 09:37
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/48395

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics