Skip navigation

“Some uninteresting data from a faraway country”: inequity and coloniality in international social psychological publications

“Some uninteresting data from a faraway country”: inequity and coloniality in international social psychological publications

Bou Zeineddine, Fouad ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5386-0579, Saab, Rim, Lášticová, Barbara, Kende, Anna and Ayanian, Arin H. (2021) “Some uninteresting data from a faraway country”: inequity and coloniality in international social psychological publications. Journal of Social Issues, 78 (2). pp. 320-345. ISSN 0022-4537 (Print), 1540-4560 (Online) (doi:10.1111/josi.12481)

[thumbnail of Author's Accepted Manuscript (AAM)]
Preview
PDF (Author's Accepted Manuscript (AAM))
48240 BOU_ZEINEDDINE_Some_Uninteresting_Data_From_A_Faraway_Country_(AAM)_2021.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (420kB) | Preview

Abstract

Modern systems of knowledge production reinforce inequalities and coloniality, especially in the Global South. We investigated whether this was the case in contemporary social psychology. We examined manifestations of coloniality of knowledge (in the form of internalized Global North standards and practices) and critical awareness and reflection (historic and systemic attributions for collective disadvantages) in a survey of social psychologists in 64 countries (N = 232). Although colleagues in the Global South and Southern and Eastern Europe adopted Global Northern publication standards and tendencies, their compliance seemed motivated by institutional demands and pragmatic concerns rather than internalized inferiority or principled conviction. Regarding international mainstream publication practices, participants from all regions (most prominently outside the Global North) reported biases, under-representation, lack of relevance, and structural disadvantages. Participants offered mainly systemic attributions for these and other disadvantages. These findings suggest that social psychologists engaged with the international publication system are caught in a double-bind between collective systemic disadvantages and coerced compliance, especially outside the Global North. Discussion focuses on the mixed-motive tensions these social psychologists experience in publishing internationally under these conditions, and the implications of this status quo for knowledge production in the discipline.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Special Issue: Decolonial Approaches to the Psychological Study of Social Issues, Installment 2: Psychology as a Site for Decolonial Analysis (June 2022): Pages 320-345. This article also appears in: 100 years of the Turkish Republic: A reflection on the psychological literature from 1923 to the present.
Uncontrolled Keywords: social psychology, research practices, precarity, inequality, coloniality, social science, academia
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
D History General and Old World > D History (General)
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Inequalities
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Last Modified: 24 Oct 2024 13:55
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/48240

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics