Skip navigation

Comparative oral monotherapy of psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, ayahuasca, and escitalopram for depressive symptoms: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Comparative oral monotherapy of psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, ayahuasca, and escitalopram for depressive symptoms: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Hsu, Tien-Wei, Tsai, Chia-Kuang, Kao, Yu-Chen, Thompson, Trevor ORCID: 0000-0001-9880-782X , Carvalho, Andre F, Yang, Fu-Chi, Tseng, Ping-Tao, Hsu, Chih-Wei, Yu, Chia-Ling, Tu, Yu-Kang and Liang, Chih-Sung ORCID: 0000-0003-1138-5586 (2024) Comparative oral monotherapy of psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, ayahuasca, and escitalopram for depressive symptoms: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. BMJ, 2024 (386):e078607. ISSN 1756-1833 (doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078607)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Open Access Article)
47812 THOMPSON_Comparative_Oral_Monotherapy_Of_Psilocybin_(OA)_2024.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (556kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective
To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and acceptability of oral monotherapy using psychedelics and escitalopram in patients with depressive symptoms, considering the potential for overestimated effectiveness due to unsuccessful blinding.

Design
Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Data sources
Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrial.gov, and World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from database inception to 12 October 2023.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies
Randomised controlled trials on psychedelics or escitalopram in adults with depressive symptoms. Eligible randomised controlled trials of psychedelics (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (known as MDMA), lysergic acid diethylamide (known as LSD), psilocybin, or ayahuasca) required oral monotherapy with no concomitant use of antidepressants.

Data extraction and synthesis
The primary outcome was change in depression, measured by the 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale. The secondary outcomes were all cause discontinuation and severe adverse events. Severe adverse events were those resulting in any of a list of negative health outcomes including, death, admission to hospital, significant or persistent incapacity, congenital birth defect or abnormality, and suicide attempt. Data were pooled using a random effects model within a Bayesian framework. To avoid estimation bias, placebo responses were distinguished between psychedelic and antidepressant trials.

Results
Placebo response in psychedelic trials was lower than that in antidepression trials of escitalopram (mean difference −3.90 (95% credible interval −7.10 to −0.96)). Although most psychedelics were better than placebo in psychedelic trials, only high dose psilocybin was better than placebo in antidepression trials of escitalopram (mean difference 6.45 (3.19 to 9.41)). However, the effect size (standardised mean difference) of high dose psilocybin decreased from large (0.88) to small (0.31) when the reference arm changed from placebo response in the psychedelic trials to antidepressant trials. The relative effect of high dose psilocybin was larger than escitalopram at 10 mg (4.66 (95% credible interval 1.36 to 7.74)) and 20 mg (4.69 (1.64 to 7.54)). None of the interventions was associated with higher all cause discontinuation or severe adverse events than the placebo.

Conclusions
Of the available psychedelic treatments for depressive symptoms, patients treated with high dose psilocybin showed better responses than those treated with placebo in the antidepressant trials, but the effect size was small.

Systematic review registration
PROSPERO, CRD42023469014.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: psilocybin, ayahuasca, escitalopram, depression, meta-analysis
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RZ Other systems of medicine
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Chronic Illness and Ageing
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Last Modified: 23 Aug 2024 14:42
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/47812

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics