Kuboka, Maureen, Grace (Randolph), Delia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0195-9489, Artursson, Karin, Lindahl, Johanna, Carlsson, Gunnar and Mutua, Florence (2024) Food safety in informal public markets in Kenya: perceptions of stakeholders in the food chain. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8:1411318. pp. 1-16. ISSN 2571-581X (Online) (doi:10.3389/fsufs.2024.1411318)

Preview

PDF (VoR) 47583_GRACE RANDOLPH_Food_safety_in_informal_public_markets_in_Kenya_Perceptions_of_stakeholders_in_the_food_chain.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (971kB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction: Informal markets play a crucial role in providing fresh and nutritious foods for people in low and middle-income countries. However, the safety of food sold in these markets remains a major concern, contributing to a high burden of foodborne illnesses.
Methods: This study was designed to analyze stakeholder perceptions of food safety in selected informal public markets in Kenya. Eight focus group discussions and 15 key informant interviews were conducted. In addition, two workshops were held to validate the findings.
Results and discussion: We found that consumers and vendors confounded food quality, especially freshness, with safety, and paid more attention to appearance and physical qualities than food safety. Information (such as branding and expiry dates) and heuristic cues (such as the flow of buyers and the presence of flies) were used to assess food safety. Meat was perceived as the food most likely to cause disease. Chemical hazards in fresh produce and aflatoxins in maize were mentioned as priority hazards by both vendors and consumers. Stakeholders more knowledgeable about food safety considered microbial hazards as a top priority. Although diarrheal diseases were reported to be prevalent in the communities, these were often thought to be the result of agri-chemical residues in fresh produce or the consumption of high-fat foods, and not commonly linked to bacteria in food. Gaps identified during the interviews included poor infrastructure, inadequate food safety knowledge, insufficient or prohibitive policies, insufficient political will, and poor food safety-related practices. There were few mentions of lack of motivation or incentives for behavior change, or insufficient consumer demand for food safety. To fill the gaps, several opportunities were discussed, including contextualizing policies and regulations, investing in infrastructure, capacity building, and training, and promoting involvement and collaboration among various stakeholders.
Conclusion: This study has highlighted gaps and misperceptions that need to be addressed through proper knowledge and awareness to effectively combat foodborne disease challenges. Behavioral change approaches to improve food safety are recommended.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	foodborne disease; food value chain; risk perception; participatory; public markets; East Africa
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Engineering & Science Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Centre for Food Systems Research
Last Modified:	10 Jul 2024 14:07
URI:	http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/47583

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads