Skip navigation

Poor-quality legal advice: re-imagining how immigration detention centres should run in England

Poor-quality legal advice: re-imagining how immigration detention centres should run in England

Riaz, Ayesha ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4503-1906 (2024) Poor-quality legal advice: re-imagining how immigration detention centres should run in England. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 43 (2). pp. 221-245. ISSN 1020-4067 (Print), 1471-695X (Online) (doi:10.1093/rsq/hdae005)

[thumbnail of AAM] PDF (AAM)
46644_RIAZ_Poor-quality_legal_advice_Re-imagining_how_immigration_detention_centres_should_run_in_England.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 12 April 2026.

Download (387kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The High Court of England and Wales in the case of R (Detention Action) v Lord Chancellor, ruled that the Lord Chancellor had acted lawfully due to the way he operated the Detention Duty Advice Scheme (hereafter “DDAS”). The DDAS is a publicly funded legal service provided to detainees in immigration detention centres. Under it, all detainees are eligible to receive up to 30 minutes of free advice from legal representatives. This approach to detention has been critiqued by scholars on the grounds that a lack of time is afforded to detainees. Some research has been undertaken on the lack of availability of publicly funded legal advice in detention. However, existing literature has yet to canvass the issue in relation to the relaxation of the rules in 2018, whereby contracts were awarded to legal aid providers that lacked experience of dealing with detainees. In this article, I address this lacuna by arguing that detainees were hindered from accessing good quality legal advice owing to the lack of experience and expertise of the newer providers. Therefore, I will consider ways of remedying the current dysfunctional system.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Lord Chancellor, legal aid, England, immigration detention centres, poor-quality legal advice, immigration and asylum, access to justice
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
K Law > K Law (General)
K Law > KD England and Wales
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences
Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences > School of Law & Criminology (LAC)
Last Modified: 12 Sep 2024 13:21
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/46644

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics