Skip navigation

The impact of market and non-market-based environmental policy instruments on firms’ sustainable technological innovation: evidence from Chinese firms

The impact of market and non-market-based environmental policy instruments on firms’ sustainable technological innovation: evidence from Chinese firms

Jiang, Jie ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5461-1574, Zhang, Qihang and Hui, Yifan (2023) The impact of market and non-market-based environmental policy instruments on firms’ sustainable technological innovation: evidence from Chinese firms. Sustainability, 15 (5):4425. pp. 1-21. ISSN 2071-1050 (Online) (doi:10.3390/su15054425)

[thumbnail of VoR]
Preview
PDF (VoR)
sustainability-15-04425-3.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (612kB) | Preview

Abstract

A firm’s sustainable technological innovation (STI) is an important strategy to cope with the global challenges of the climate emergency and resource constraints. To encourage firms to pursue sustainable innovation, the government put its efforts into designing a proper environmental policy (EP). According to Porter’s hypothesis, a well-designed and flexible EP will advance the pace of a firm’s innovation. This paper argues that a flexible EP portfolio combining market and non-market-based EP instruments may affect a firm’s STI. Market-based EP instruments are cost-effective and consistent from a long-term view, whereas non-market-based EP instruments are more forceful and effective in the short term. Hence, these two kinds of EP instruments could complement each other. Furthermore, technical executives in top management teams will moderate the relationships between EP instruments and firms’ STI. Data analysis results of 618 Chinese public firms, who constantly participated in R&D activities during 2015–2019, supported these hypotheses. Contributions to EP and firm innovation theory, as well as suggestions for policymakers and firms’ top management teams, are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Economics and Sustainability Policy.
Uncontrolled Keywords: environmental policy; policy mix; sustainable technological innovation; technical executives
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Business
Greenwich Business School > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC)
Last Modified: 02 Dec 2024 15:55
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/46483

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics