Skip navigation

Racial and ethnic disparities in the prescribing of pain medication in US primary care settings, 1999–2019: where are we now?

Racial and ethnic disparities in the prescribing of pain medication in US primary care settings, 1999–2019: where are we now?

Thompson, Trevor ORCID: 0000-0001-9880-782X , Stathi, Sofia ORCID: 0000-0002-1218-5239 , Shin, Jae Il, Carvalho, Andre, Solmi, Marco and Liang, Chih-Sung (2024) Racial and ethnic disparities in the prescribing of pain medication in US primary care settings, 1999–2019: where are we now? Journal of General Internal Medicine. pp. 1-9. ISSN 0884-8734 (Print), 1525-1497 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08638-5)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Publisher VoR)
45671_THOMPSON_ Racial_and_Ethnic_Disparities_in_the_Prescribing_of_Pain_Medication_in_US_Primary_Care_Settings.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (926kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Policy initiatives have attempted to reduce healthcare inequalities in the USA, but evidence on whether these initiatives have reduced racial and ethnic disparities in pain treatment in primary care is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether racial and ethnic disparities in medication prescribed for pain in primary care settings have diminished over a 21-year period from 1999 to 2019. DESIGN: An annual, representative cross-sectional probability sample of visits to US primary care physicians, taken from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. PATIENTS: Pain-related visits to primary care physicians. MAIN MEASURES: Prescriptions for opioid and non-opioid analgesics. KEY RESULTS: Of 599,293 (16%) sampled visits, 94,422 were pain-related, representing a population-weighted estimate of 143 million visits made annually to primary care physicians for pain. Relative risk analysis controlling for insurance, pain type, and other potential confounds showed no difference in pain medication prescribed between Black and White patients (p = .121). However, White patients were 1.61 (95% CI 1.32-1.97) and Black patients 1.57 (95% CI 1.26-1.95) times more likely to be prescribed opioids than a more underrepresented group consisting of Asian, Native-Hawaiian/Pacific-Islander, and American-Indian/Alaska-Natives (ps < .001). Non-Hispanic/Latino patients were 1.32 (95% CI 1.18-1.45) times more likely to receive opioids for pain than Hispanic/Latino patients (p < .001). Penalized cubic spline regression found no substantive narrowing of disparities over time. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that additional intervention strategies, or better implementation of existing strategies, are needed to eliminate ethnic and racial disparities in pain treatment towards the goal of equitable healthcare.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: analgesia; pain; NAMCS; disparities; race; ethnicity; primary care
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Chronic Illness and Ageing
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Inequalities
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Last Modified: 07 Feb 2024 10:06
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/45671

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics