Essex, Ryan ORCID: 0000-0003-3497-3137, Aked, Hil, Daniels, Rebecca, Newton, Paul ORCID: 0000-0002-8525-6763 and Weldon, Sharon M. ORCID: 0000-0001-5487-5265 (2023) Justifying non-violent resistance: the perspectives of healthcare workers. Clinical Ethics. ISSN 1477-7509 (Print), 1758-101X (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/14777509231156050)

Preview	PDF (Open Access Article) 38469_ESSEX_Justifying_non_violent_resistance_the_perspectives_of_healthcare_workers_(OA)_2023.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview
Preview	PDF (AAM) 38469_ESSEX_Justifying_non_violent_resistance_the_perspectives_of_healthcare_workers.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (522kB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction: Non-violent resistance, carried out by healthcare workers, has been a common phenomenon. Despite this and despite the issues this type of action raises, we know little about the healthcare workers who engage in this action and their perspectives about its justification. This exploratory study sought to address this gap, examining these fundamental questions amongst a sample of healthcare workers who have engaged in acts of resistance, exploring their understanding of non-violent resistance, its justification and the barriers they faced in engaging in such action. Methods: Participants were recruited through Medact's (https://www.medact.org/) member database and directed to an online survey hosted on Qualtrics. While participants were unlikely to be representative of the broader UK healthcare community, participants were in an advantageous position to comment on non-violent resistance. Descriptive quantitative analysis and a content analysis were conducted. Results: The majority of participants felt that non-violent resistance could be justified dependent on its cause and/or the action in question. Within this, most felt that if action were non-violent, that if it didn't harm patients and that if the issue in question had to do with health being compromised, action was often justified. A number of others framed their justification as being a right or duty to engage in non-violent resistance. In relation to barriers to engaging in non-violent resistance, these fell into three categories: personal, professional and broader concerns related to society or the general culture found in healthcare. Within these, time and concerns about registration or the consequences of engaging in action were cited as the greatest barriers. Conclusions: These results suggest that healthcare workers who regularly engage in non-violent action carefully thought through their actions, acknowledging the diversity of actions and issues that could be challenged, for many patient care remained a primary concern. There is a need for clarity from regulatory bodies and in particular the need for dialogue between healthcare bodies and healthcare workers who continue to engage in acts of non-violent resistance.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	protest; health; healthcare; resistance; activism
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Chronic Illness and Ageing Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Professional Workforce Development Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Health Sciences (HEA)
Last Modified:	06 Mar 2023 11:38
URI:	http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/38469

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads