Skip navigation

2020 COVID-19-related lockdown: the relationships between coping strategies, psychological adjustment and resilience among a non-clinical sample of British adults

2020 COVID-19-related lockdown: the relationships between coping strategies, psychological adjustment and resilience among a non-clinical sample of British adults

Lafarge, Caroline ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2148-078X, Milani, Raffaella, Cahill, Sharon and Görzig, Anke ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7623-0836 (2022) 2020 COVID-19-related lockdown: the relationships between coping strategies, psychological adjustment and resilience among a non-clinical sample of British adults. Adversity and Resilience Science, 3 (4). pp. 297-307. ISSN 2662-2424 (Online) (doi:10.1007/s42844-022-00079-5)

[thumbnail of AAM]
Preview
PDF (AAM)
37894_GOERZIG_2020_COVID_19_related_lockdown_the_relationships_between_coping_strategies.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (280kB) | Preview

Abstract

To curb COVID-19 infections, the British government enforced a series of lockdowns resulting in restrictions on movement and socialisation. This study assessed which groups may have been at higher risk of emotional distress among a non-clinical sample of British adults. It also examined which coping strategies, if any, related to more positive psychological adjustment and higher resilience scores. A cross-sectional, correlational study was carried out. Using a convenience sample, an online survey was conducted in April–June 2020. One hundred ninety-four participants completed the Brief COPE (coping), the GAD-7 (anxiety), the PHQ-9 (depression), the CD-RISC (resilience), and provided demographic information. Participants used mainly coping strategies considered to be adaptive. They exhibited mild/moderate anxiety and depression symptoms, and moderate resilience scores. However, some individuals displayed significantly higher distress symptoms and lower resilience scores than others, especially those aged under 35 (particularly 18–24), those not working, those who were single and/or childless. Results also show that coping strategies including substance use, behavioural disengagement and self-blame were associated with anxiety and/or depression symptoms, conversely, positive reframing related to lower anxiety symptomatology. Interventions promoting positive reframing may be helpful. Similarly, interventions promoting connection to others, a factor known to enhance resilience, may be beneficial. This is particularly relevant to groups who may be more at risk of psychological distress, such as young individuals.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: COVID-19,; lockdown; coping; resilience; anxiety; depression; adversity
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Last Modified: 21 Oct 2023 01:38
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/37894

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics