Skip navigation

Evaluating R&D efficiency of China’s listed lithium battery enterprises

Evaluating R&D efficiency of China’s listed lithium battery enterprises

Bai, Shizhen, Bi, Xinrui, Han, Chunjia, Zhou, Qijun ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6302-6756, Shang, Wenlong, Yang, Mu, Wang, Lin, Ieromonachou, Petros ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5842-9585 and He, Hao (2022) Evaluating R&D efficiency of China’s listed lithium battery enterprises. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 9 (3). pp. 473-485. ISSN 2096-0255 (Online) (doi:10.1007/s42524-022-0213-5)

[thumbnail of 37744_IEROMONACHOU_Evaluating_RandD_efficiency_of_Chinas_listed_lithium_battery_enterprises.pdf]
Preview
PDF
37744_IEROMONACHOU_Evaluating_RandD_efficiency_of_Chinas_listed_lithium_battery_enterprises.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Promoting the growth of the lithium battery sector has been a critical aspect of China’s energy policy in terms of achieving carbon neutrality. However, despite significant supports on research and development (R&D) investments that have resulted in increasing size, the sector looks to be falling behind in technological areas still. In order to guide future policies and understand proper ways of promoting R&D efficiency, we, thus, looked into the lithium battery industry of China. Specifically, data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used as the primary approach based on evidence from 22 listed lithium battery enterprises. The performance of the five leading players was compared to that of the industry as a whole. There was little indication of a meaningful improvement in R&D efficiency throughout our sample from 2010 to 2019 indicated in the result; though, during this period, a significant increase in R&D expenditure was witnessed. This finding was supported as the result shows the average technical efficiency of the 22 enterprises being 0.442, whereas the average pure technical efficiency at 0.503, suggesting they are suffering from decreasing returns to scale (DRS). On the contrary, the performance of the five leading players seems to be superior because their average efficiency scores are higher than the industry’s average, and that they are experiencing increasing scale efficiency (IRS). We draw on these findings to suggest for policymakers that supporting technologically intensive sectors should entail more than simply increasing investment scale; rather, it should also encompass assisting businesses in developing efficient managerial processes for R&D.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Data Envelopment Analysis, R&D investment efficiency, China’s listed lithium battery enterprises, technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, scale efficiency
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Business
Faculty of Business > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC)
Faculty of Business > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC) > Connected Cities Research Group
Greenwich Business School > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC)
Greenwich Business School > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC) > Connected Cities Research Group (CCRG)
Last Modified: 02 Dec 2024 15:59
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/37744

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics