Skip navigation

Who let the dogs out? Exploring the spatial ecology of free‐roaming domestic dogs in western Kenya

Who let the dogs out? Exploring the spatial ecology of free‐roaming domestic dogs in western Kenya

Muinde, Patrick, Bettridge, Judy M. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3917-4660, Sousa, Filipe M., Duerr, Salome, Dohoo, Ian R., Berezowski, John, Mutwiri, Titus, Odinga, Christian O., Fèvre, Eric M. and Falzon, Laura C. (2021) Who let the dogs out? Exploring the spatial ecology of free‐roaming domestic dogs in western Kenya. Ecology and Evolution, 11 (9). pp. 4218-4231. ISSN 2045-7758 (Online) (doi:10.1002/ece3.7317)

[thumbnail of Publisher's PDF - Open Access]
Preview
PDF (Publisher's PDF - Open Access)
31908 BETTRIDGE_Who_Let_the_Dogs_Out_(OA)_2021.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

The spatial ecology of free‐roaming dogs determines their role in the transmission of zoonoses. This study describes the geographic range of and identifies sites frequently visited by free‐roaming domestic dogs in western Kenya.

Eight sites in Busia county, western Kenya, were selected. At each site, ten dog‐keeping households were recruited, a questionnaire was administered, and a GPS logger was fixed around the neck of one dog in each household. Loggers were programmed to capture the dog's position every minute, for five consecutive days. Individual summaries of GPS recordings were produced, and the daily distance traveled was calculated. 50% and 95% utilization distribution isopleths were produced, and the area within these isopleths was extracted to estimate the size of the core and extended Home Ranges (HRs), respectively. Linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the movement parameters. The centroid points of the 10, 50, and 90% isopleths were reproduced, and the corresponding sites identified on the ground.

Seventy‐three dogs were included in the final analyses. The median daily distance traveled was 13.5km, while the median core and extended HRs were 0.4 and 9.3 ha, respectively. Older dogs had a larger extended HR and traveled more daily, while the effect of sex on dog movement depended on their neutering status. Dogs spent most of their time at their household; other frequently visited sites included other household compounds, fields, and rubbish dumps. One of the centroids corresponded to a field located across the international Kenya–Uganda border, emphasizing the fluidity across the border in this ecosystem. Multiple dogs visited the same location, highlighting the heterogeneous contact networks between dogs, and between dogs and people.

The field data presented are of value both in understanding domestic dog ecology and resource utilization, and in contextualizing infectious and parasitic disease transmission models.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2021 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Canis lupus familiaris; Habitat Utilization; Home Range; Kenya; Roaming behavior; Utilization Distribution; Zoonoses
Subjects: S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Agriculture, Health & Environment Department
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Centre for Food Systems Research
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Centre for Food Systems Research > Food Safety and Quality
Last Modified: 27 Nov 2024 14:49
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/31908

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics