Robertson, Alexandra O., Tadic, Valerija ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3982-0340 and Rahi, Jugnoo S. (2020) Attitudes, experiences, and preferences of ophthalmicprofessionals regarding routine use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice. PLoS ONE, 15 (12):e0243563. ISSN 1932-6203 (Online) (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243563)

Preview

PDF (Publisher's PDF - Open Access) 30405 TADIC_Attitudes_Experiences_and_Preferences_(OA)_2020.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (549kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background/Objectives:
Routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess quality of health care systems is mandated in many countries and has been implemented successfully in many specialities. Ophthalmology currently lags behind. To support and inform future implementation, we investigated paediatric ophthalmic clinicians’ experience of, and future training needs for, using child-appropriate vision PROMs and their views about the barriers and enablers to future routine implementation in clinical practice.

Methods:
We conducted a pilot study, using an online survey to elicit the experience, attitudes, training needs and perceptions of barriers and enablers to routine PROMs use of ophthalmic health professionals in the Paediatric Ophthalmology Department at Great Ormond Street Hospital, London. A focus-group was undertaken to discuss survey results and preferences regarding presentation of PROM data. Analysis comprised descriptive statistics, presented alongside complementary qualitative data.

Results:
Eighteen clinicians in the department completed the survey. Twenty-seven took part in the focus group. Clinicians had limited experience of using PROMs but high confidence in the potential positive impact on communication with patients, monitoring chronic conditions and clinical decision-making. Clinicians identified operational issues (collection and analysis of data) and impact (interpretation and application of data) as the two key areas for consideration. Training and information requirements before implementation were clearly articulated, alongside the benefits of using digital/electronic data capture ahead of consultations to allow efficiency and automated analysis, and presentation in an appropriate visual format alongside clinical data to ensure meaningful use.

Conclusion:
The findings of this pilot study of ophthalmic clinicians working in a specialist paediatric ophthalmology department, suggest that ophthalmic clinicians recognise the potential benefits of routine PROMs use in clinical practice. Together with existing literature outside ophthalmology relating to overcoming barriers and exploiting enablers to routine implementation, findings may be applicable in planning routine PROM implementation in paediatric ophthalmology.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	patient-reported outcome measures, paediatric ophthalmology, visual impairment, children and young people
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Applied Psychology Research Group Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM) Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Vulnerable Children and Families
Last Modified:	04 Oct 2021 16:20
URI:	http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/30405

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads