Feasibility of using patient-reported outcome measures with visually impaired children/young people attending paediatric ophthalmology clinics
Robertson, Alexandra O., Tadić, Valerija ORCID: 0000-0003-3982-0340 , Cortina-Borja, Mario and Rahi, Jugnoo (2020) Feasibility of using patient-reported outcome measures with visually impaired children/young people attending paediatric ophthalmology clinics. Archives of Diseases in Childhood, 106 (7). pp. 687-692. ISSN 0003-9888 (Print), 1468-2044 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-318991)
|
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript)
30404 TADIC_Feasibility_of_Using_Patient-reported_Outcome_Measures_(AAM)_2020.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (533kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Objective:
To explore feasibility of using child/young person patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) routinely in practice, using vision-specific instruments and paediatric ophthalmology as the exemplar.
Methods:
Participants comprised patients aged 8–17 years, with visual impairment or low vision (visual acuity of the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) worse than 0.3 in the better eye), attending the Department of Ophthalmology at Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK. All participants completed age-appropriate PROMs before attending their outpatient appointment. Half were randomly assigned to completion at home, with the choice of paper-and-pencil or electronic format. The other half were invited to complete PROMs during their hospital appointment, and randomly assigned to completion format. All participants completed a face-to-face survey exploring their attitudes and preferences. Analysis comprised survival analysis, and direct comparisons of proportions, with complementary qualitative data analysis.
Results:
93 patients participated. 48 (98%) completing PROMs at home chose the paper-and-pencil format. Completion at home took longer than at hospital (median=20, vs 14 min, p<0.001). Visual acuity was associated with completion time (p=0.007) and missing data (p=0.03). Overall, 52 (60%) reported a preference for completion at home but there was no clear preference for format (37 (43%) preferred either format).
Conclusion:
PROM completion at home ahead of hospital appointments may be preferable for collecting complete, high-quality datasets. Despite equipoise on preference for format, the majority of those completing at home chose the traditional paper-and-pencil format, despite impaired sight. These findings should inform implementation of child/young person PROMs into routine practice.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | patient-reported outcome measure, visual impairment, children and young people, feasibility, paediatric ophthalmology |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: | Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Applied Psychology Research Group Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM) |
Last Modified: | 27 Jul 2021 10:43 |
URI: | http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/30404 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year