Psychosocial interventions for dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review of effectiveness and implementation readiness.
Stoner, Charlotte R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1536-4347, Lakshminarayanan, Monisha, Durgante, Helen and Spector, Aimee (2019) Psychosocial interventions for dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review of effectiveness and implementation readiness. Aging & Mental health, 25 (3). pp. 408-419. ISSN 1360-7863 (Print), 1364-6915 (Online) (doi:10.1080/13607863.2019.1695742)
Preview |
PDF (Publisher's PDF - Open Access)
28133 STONER_Psychosocial_Interventions_for_Dementia_in_LMICs_(OA)_2019.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Introduction:
Despite wide uptake in high-income countries (HICs), less is known about the effectiveness and implementation of psychological, social and cognitive interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite this, such interventions are increasingly used. The aim of this review was to appraise the effectiveness and implementation readiness of psychosocial interventions for people with dementia in LMICs
.
Methods:
A systematic search of databases from 1998–2019. Studies were rated on two scales assessing quality and implementation readiness.
Results:
Seventeen articles describing 11 interventions in six countries were evaluated. Interventions included Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST), a Multidisciplinary Cognitive Rehabilitation Programme (MCRP), singing interventions, occupational therapy and reminiscence therapy. The quality of included studies was variable, and many had low sample sizes. Evidence for improving both cognition and quality of life was found in two interventions: Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) and a Multidisciplinary Cognitive Rehabilitation Programme (MCRP). Implementation issues were more likely to be explored in studies of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) than in any other intervention.
Conclusions:
Of the included studies here, CST appears to be the most implementation ready, improving both cognition and quality of life with implementation readiness effectively explored in two LMIC countries: India and Tanzania.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Developing countries, Alzheimer’s disease, cognition, quality of life |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: | Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM) Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Chronic Illness and Ageing Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Mental Health |
Last Modified: | 31 Aug 2021 07:16 |
URI: | http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/28133 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year