Skip navigation

Comparative performance of five hermetic bag brands during on-farm smallholder cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp) storage

Comparative performance of five hermetic bag brands during on-farm smallholder cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp) storage

Ngwenyama, Patrick, Mvumi, Brighton, M., Nyanga, Loveness, K., Stathers, Tanya, E. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7767-6186 and Siziba, Shephard (2020) Comparative performance of five hermetic bag brands during on-farm smallholder cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp) storage. Journal of Stored Products Research, 88:101658. ISSN 0022-474X (doi:10.1016/j.jspr.2020.101658)

[thumbnail of Author's Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author's Accepted Manuscript)
28023 STATHERS_Comparative_Performance_Of_Five_Hermetic_Bag_Brands_(AAM)_2020.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (785kB) | Preview

Abstract

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) grain is an important source of protein for smallholder farmers in developing countries. However, cowpea grains are highly susceptible to bruchid attack, resulting in high quantitative and qualitative postharvest losses (PHLs). We evaluated the performance of five different hermetic bag brands for cowpea grain storage in two contrasting agro-ecological zones of Zimbabwe (Guruve and Mbire districts) for an 8-month storage period during the 2017/18 and 2018/19 storage seasons. The hermetic bag treatments evaluated included: GrainPro Super Grain bags (SGB) IVR™; PICS bags; AgroZ® Ordinary bags; AgroZ® Plus bags; ZeroFly® hermetic bags. These were compared to untreated grain in a polypropylene bag (negative control) and Actellic Gold Dust® (positive chemical control). All treatments were housed in farmers’ stores and were subjected to natural insect infestation. Hermetic bag treatments were significantly superior (p< 0.001) to non-hermetic storage in limiting grain damage, weight loss and insect population development during storage. However, rodent control is recommended, as rodent attack rendered some hermetic bags less effective. Actellic Gold Dust® was as effective as the hermetic bags. Callosobruchus rhodesianus (Pic.) populations increased within eight weeks of storage commencement, causing high damage and losses in both quality and quantity, with highest losses recorded in the untreated control. Cowpea grain stored in Mbire district sustained significantly higher insect population and damage than Guruve district which is ascribed to differences in environmental conditions. The parasitic wasp, Dinarmus basalis (Rondani) was suppressed by Actellic Gold Dust® and all hermetic treatments. All the hermetic bag brands tested are recommended for smallholder farmer use in reducing PHLs while enhancing environmental and worker safety, and food and nutrition security.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Hermetic storage, on-farm storage, synthetic pesticide, Callosobruchus rhodesianus, postharvest losses
Subjects: S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Food & Markets Department
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Food Systems Research Group
Related URLs:
Last Modified: 18 Aug 2021 01:38
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/28023

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics