Skip navigation

Comparison of different trap designs for capture of noctuid moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with pheromone and floral odor attractants

Comparison of different trap designs for capture of noctuid moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with pheromone and floral odor attractants

Whitfield, E. Charles ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0788-9688, Lobos, Enrique, Cork, Alan and Hall, David R. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7887-466X (2019) Comparison of different trap designs for capture of noctuid moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with pheromone and floral odor attractants. Journal of Economic Entomology. ISSN 0022-0493 (Print), 1938-291X (Online) (doi:10.1093/jee/toz093)

[thumbnail of Author Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript)
25042 HALL Comparison_of_Different_Trap_Designs_2019.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (588kB) | Preview

Abstract

Six trap designs were assessed for capturing noctuid moths in field trials in the UK and Argentina. The traps were baited with either a sex pheromone for Autographa gamma in the UK trials and Helicoverpa gelotopoeon in Argentina, or a floral odor blend. In the UK trials the Universal Trap and a funnel sleeve trap were compared; in Argentina the funnel sleeve trap, a homemade bucket trap, and three sticky traps: LepTrap, wing trap, and delta trap were compared. Comparisons were made between the traps and attractants and captures of noctuid moths and non-target insects. Traps baited with the floral attractant caught a lower number but a wider range of noctuid species including Helicoverpa, Spodoptera, Rachiplusia, Dargida, Mythimna, Chrysodeixis, Agrotis, and Autographa spp, and non-target insects. In the UK trials, the funnel sleeve trap caught significantly more A. gamma than the Universal Trap. The addition of an insecticide to the Universal Trap marginally increased trap catches. In the Argentinian trials, the homemade bucket and the sleeve traps outperformed all sticky traps in most situations regardless of crop environment and attractant type. The homemade bucket and the funnel sleeve traps are also considerably cheaper than the other trap designs. Of the sticky traps the LepTrap caught more noctuids than the wing and delta traps. The results suggest that the bucket trap and the sleeve trap have a much greater maximum capacity and possibly a greater retention efficiency for noctuid moths compared to the sticky traps.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Trapping, Helicoverpa gelotopoeon, Autographa gamma, kairomone, floral attractant.
Subjects: S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Agriculture, Health & Environment Department
Last Modified: 14 May 2020 01:38
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/25042

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics