Skip navigation

Predicting relative load by peak movement velocity and ratings of perceived exertion in power clean

Predicting relative load by peak movement velocity and ratings of perceived exertion in power clean

Naclerio, Fernando ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7405-4894 and Larumbe-Zabala, Eneko (2018) Predicting relative load by peak movement velocity and ratings of perceived exertion in power clean. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 13 (3). ISSN 1988-5202 (doi:10.14198/jhse.2018.133.14)

[thumbnail of Publisher's PDF - Open Access]
Preview
PDF (Publisher's PDF - Open Access)
20288 NACLERIO_Predicting_Relative_Load_By_Peak_Movement_Velocity_(OA)_2018.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (251kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Author Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript)
20288 NACLERIO_Predicting_Relative_Load_By_Peak_Movement_Velocity_2018.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (352kB) | Preview

Abstract

Evaluating an individual’s maximal strength is considered a key factor in prescribing and regulating resistance training programs in athletes. The present study analyzed the suitability of predicting the relative load lifted in the power clean exercise from the peak movement velocity and perceived exertion. In order to determine the full-load velocity and load-perceived exertion relationships, 154 young, resistance-trained male athletes performed a 4- to 6-set progressive test up to the one-repetition maximum. Longitudinal regression models were used to predict the relative load from the peak velocity and the OMNI-RES 0-10 scale, taking sets as the time-related variable. Load associated with peak velocity and with perceived exertion scale values expressed after performing 1 or 2 repetitions, were used to construct two adjusted predictive equations: Relative load = 128.85 – 25.86 × peak velocity; and Relative load = 31.10 + 7.26 × OMNI-RES 0–10 scale value. Although both models provided effective estimates of relative load, the coefficient of determination (R2) of the OMNI-RES perceived exertion scale was larger than when using the peak movement velocity model (88% vs. 46%). These findings highlight the importance of perceived exertion to estimate strength performance in the power clean exercise.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: OMNI-RES SCALE, One Repetition Maximum (1RM), Loading Intensity, Weightlifting
Subjects: Q Science > QP Physiology
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Exercise Activity and Rehabilitation
Last Modified: 22 Nov 2021 11:49
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/20288

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics