Labuschagne, Lushka, Swanepoel, Lourens H., Taylor, Peter J., Belmain, Steven R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5590-7545 and Keith, Mark (2016) Are avian predators effective biological control agents for rodent pest management in agricultural systems? Biological Control, 101. pp. 94-102. ISSN 1049-9644 (Print), 1090-2112 (Online) (doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.07.003)

Preview	PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript) 15648 BELMAIN_Avian_Predators_13-06-2016.pdf - Accepted Version Download (403kB) | Preview
	PDF (Email of Acceptance) 15648 BELMAIN_Acceptance_Email_2016.pdf - Additional Metadata Restricted to Repository staff only Download (101kB)

Abstract

Worldwide rodent pests are of significant economic and health importance. Controlling rodent pests will, therefore, not only benefit food security but also human and animal health. While rodent pests are most often chemically controlled, there is increased interest in biological control through avian predation. A rich body of research has addressed the impact of avian predators on wild rodent populations, but little is known about the effectiveness of avian predators as biological control agents of rodent pests in agricultural systems. In this study, we systematically reviewed research that investigated different aspects of avian predation on rodent pest populations in order to increase our understanding of the impact and effectiveness of avian predation on rodent pests. Several avian predators (Tyto alba, Elanus axillaris Falco tinnunculus, F. cenchroides, Bubo bengalensis, Buteo rufinus) were commonly cited in the biological control of rodents; however, barn owls (T. alba) are the most cited species (86% of studies). We found some support that the use of avian predators produced positive, measurable effects where increased presence of avian predators tended to lower rodent pest numbers, resulting in lower crop damage. However, our review highlighted several shortcomings related to research on avian predation of rodent pests. First, research concerning rodent pest control through avian predation was limited (1.86 articles per year). Secondly, we found that studies lack statistical rigor to detect and measure change in rodent pest species abundance. Finally, the majority of studies were short term and therefore not able to evaluate long term sustainable rodent pest population suppression. We suggest that current shortcomings could be adequately addressed with control-treatment studies that quantitatively investigate the effects of avian predation on rodent pest populations and agricultural impact. Such research could help develop recommendations regarding the use of avian predators in rodent pest management.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Population dynamics; Tyto alba; Ecologically-based management
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Engineering & Science Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Agriculture, Health & Environment Department Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Ecosystem Services Research Group Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Pest Behaviour Research Group
Last Modified:	02 Dec 2019 14:10
URI:	http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/15648

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads