Skip navigation

Financial–real-side interactions in an extended monetary circuit with shadow banking: Loving or dangerous hugs?

Financial–real-side interactions in an extended monetary circuit with shadow banking: Loving or dangerous hugs?

Botta, Alberto ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9464-8251, Caverzasi, Eugenio and Tori, Daniele (2015) Financial–real-side interactions in an extended monetary circuit with shadow banking: Loving or dangerous hugs? International Journal of Political Economy, 44 (3). pp. 196-227. ISSN 0891-1916 (Print), 1558-0970 (Online) (doi:10.1080/08911916.2015.1095049)

[thumbnail of Author Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript)
14454_Botta_Finacial_real_side_interactions_(AAM)_2015.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Monetary circuit (MC) theory is one of the most interesting attempts to formally describe the functioning of a monetary production economy as centered on the concept of the flux–reflux of money. Endogenous money creation by commercial banks allows the circuit to open and firms to implement production processes. Financial markets “passively” close the circuit by intermediating savings via bond and equity issuance. Despite its natural focus on financial-real side links, the monetary circuit literature has paid relatively little attention to “financialization” and the way it has modified real-financial dynamics. In this article, we analyze whether the flux–reflux perspective of the circuit may be fruitfully applied to the description of the linkages between the real economy and finance in a financialized economy. We propose two interconnected circuits, one for the real economy and one for the financial one. In this context, finance can still ensure a consistent closure of the whole system, thus directly allowing the functioning of the real economy. Newly developed inside-finance interactions, however, may indirectly influence real world dynamics, by easing/ restricting access to credit/financial markets, and give rise to boom-and-bust cycles. Our aim is twofold: modeling modern financial worlds within an MC framework and understanding how financialization could have changed real-financial interactions.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Political Economy on 5 Nov 2015, available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2015.1095049
Uncontrolled Keywords: Monetary circuit theory, Financialization, Shadow banking
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Business > Institute of Political Economy, Governance, Finance and Accountability (IPEGFA) > Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre (GPERC)
Last Modified: 04 Aug 2021 16:33
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/14454

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics