Nuclear technology options for South Africa. Pay more for nuclear: Report 1
Thomas, Steve (2014) Nuclear technology options for South Africa. Pay more for nuclear: Report 1. Documentation. Earthlife Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
South Africa’s call for tenders for nuclear power plants failed because the costs were high and because the requirements to obtain funding were not politically acceptable. The response to this failure seemed to be that pursuing a wider range of technical options and partners would produce a cheaper and more readily financed offer. The new options mooted include reactors from Korea, China and Russia. The perception that these options will be cheaper is likely to be an illusion. In addition, the designs are unproven and raise serious issues of verifying that they meet the required safety standards.
Item Type: | Monograph (Documentation) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | nuclear power, South Africa, technology options |
Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance |
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: | Faculty of Business > Centre for Work and Employment Research (CREW) > Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU) Faculty of Business |
Related URLs: | |
Last Modified: | 14 Oct 2016 09:29 |
URI: | http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/12275 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |