Skip navigation

Réseaux et controverses: de l’effet des normes sur la dynamique des structures / Networks and controversies: on the effect of norms on the dynamics of structures

Réseaux et controverses: de l’effet des normes sur la dynamique des structures / Networks and controversies: on the effect of norms on the dynamics of structures

Lazega, Emmanuel, Mounier, Lise, Snijders, Tom and Tubaro, Paola (2008) Réseaux et controverses: de l’effet des normes sur la dynamique des structures / Networks and controversies: on the effect of norms on the dynamics of structures. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49 (3). pp. 467-498. ISSN 0035-2969 (Print), 1958-5691 (Online)

[img] PDF
LMST2007PourRFS2007Final.pdf - Submitted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (402kB)

Abstract

The issue of the influence of norms on behaviour is as old as sociology itself. Institutional theorists, such as Selznick (1957), theorized this influence in terms of « precarious values ». This paper uses this classical view to bring in structure between norms and behaviour. To do this, we explore the selection effect (Snijders, 2001,2005) of a conflict of norms (a controversy) on the evolution of the advice network among lay judges at the Commercial Court of Paris and on their decisions. We use a jurisprudential case about unfair competition (material and « moral » damages), a case that we submitted to all the judges of this court. The controversy among them is about the extent to which they should be « punitive » in awarding damages, especially « moral » damages. We examine the criteria and norms that they refer to in their discretionary decision making in this case. Statistical analyses using Siena combine longitudinal advice network data collected among them with their normative dispositions. We show that, in spite of declaring themselves to be punitive, the majority of judges align themselves on judges with a law degree coming from the banking industry, who tend to be non punitive. We measure and model the selection effect of this norm on the evolution of the network, teasing out a « preferential attachment » effect in which bankers with a law degree become ever more central over time in these networks. This allows them to exercise a strong influence on the court’s judicial decision making. We argue that this approach of conformity and alignments in controversies provides new insights into the relationship between norms, structure and behaviour.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: [1] Citation: Lazega Emmanuel et al., « Réseaux et controverses : de l'effet des normes sur la dynamique des structures », Revue française de sociologie, 2008/3 Vol. 49, p. 467-498.
Uncontrolled Keywords: social networks, advice networks, network dynamics, social structure, norms, judicial institutions, economic governance.
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HA Statistics
H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Business > Centre for Business Network Analysis
Faculty of Business > Department of International Business & Economics
Faculty of Business
Related URLs:
Last Modified: 14 Oct 2016 09:14
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/5429

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics