Pavetich, Melissa and Stathi, Sofia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-5239 (2026) Bridging the political divide: meta-humanization and moral emotions shape partisan reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. ISSN 0146-1672 (Print), 1552-7433 (Online) (doi:10.1177/014616722614812)

Preview	PDF (Open Access Article) 54328 STATHI_ Bridging_The_Political_Divide_(OA)_2026.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (302kB) | Preview
	PDF (Author's Accepted Manuscript) 54328 STATHI_ Bridging_The_Political_Divide_(AAM)_2026.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (548kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

In an era of deepening political polarization, understanding how partisans believe they are perceived by ideological opponents is critical for explaining both hostility and conciliation. Across five studies (N = 1,541) conducted in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada, we examine how meta-humanization, perceiving that one’s political ingroup is seen as fully human by the outgroup, shapes moral emotional responses and downstream intergroup attitudes. Specifically, we test anger, disgust, and empathy as parallel mediators linking meta-humanization to affective polarization, negotiation, teamwork, and willingness for out-party contact, while examining perceived threat to social cohesion as a moderator. Across studies, meta-humanization reliably predicts more conciliatory intergroup attitudes, with disgust emerging as the primary affective pathway. Our findings advance theory on meta-perceptions by demonstrating that meta-humanization shapes political attitudes through moral emotion regulation, and by identifying threat to social cohesion as a condition that, under moderate levels, drives these processes. Implications for understanding and mitigating identity-based conflicts in polarized political climates are discussed threat to social cohesion as a condition that, under moderate levels, drives these processes.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was partially funded through a pump-priming grant from the British Psychology Society.
Uncontrolled Keywords:	meta-humanization, disgust, empathy, anger, threat, affective polarization
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Inequalities Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Last Modified:	24 Sep 2026 10:55
URI:	https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/54328

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads