Skip navigation

Coppice forests, between management, conversion and restoration

Coppice forests, between management, conversion and restoration

Nicolescu, Valeriu-Norocel, Spyroglou, Gavriil, Perić, Sanja, Đodan, Martina, Buzatu-Goanță, Cornelia, Krstic, Milun, Carvalho, Joao, Matsiakh, Iryna, Özel, Halil Bariş, Trajkov, Pande, Piqué, Miriam, Višnjić, Ćemal and Bartlett, Debbie (2026) Coppice forests, between management, conversion and restoration. Journal of Forest Science, 72 (2). pp. 57-72. ISSN 1212-4834 (Print), 1805-935X (Online) (doi:10.17221/5)

[thumbnail of Open Access Article]
Preview
PDF (Open Access Article)
52807 BARTLETT_ Coppice_Forests_Between_Management_Conversion_And_Restoration_(OA)_2026.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Coppice is the oldest form of systematic and sustainable use of forests, and is currently applied on about 29 million ha (about 14% of total forest land area) in Europe. It had its maximum spread in the 16th century, when an estimated 36% of all forested land in Europe was managed for coppice. Coppice forests were the most important source of fuelwood until the mid-19th century, when firewood and charcoal were substituted by alternative fuels, and the demand for construction wood increased. Consequently, coppices (both low and coppice-with-standards) started to be converted to high forests, and the process was driven by national policies and/or subsidies, which is still the situation in some European countries. During the 20th century, coppicing was abandoned in many places across Europe due to the abandonment of the countryside and population migration into cities, as well as changes in socio-economic conditions, technical advances and political restrictions. However, coppicing is still important in many European countries as the main source of firewood for the rural population, who has limited access to other sources of energy. In this context, this paper presents the most important characteristics of this complex abandonment/ management/ conversion picture, emphasising the pros and cons for the future of coppices across Europe.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: biodiversity, coppice conversion, coppice restoration, firewood vs industrial wood, history, rural population
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Q Science > Q Science (General)
S Agriculture > SD Forestry
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science
Faculty of Engineering & Science > School of Science (SCI)
Last Modified: 07 Apr 2026 15:05
URI: https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/52807

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics