Skip navigation

Cost of utilising maternal health Services in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Cost of utilising maternal health Services in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Banke-Thomas, Aduragbemi ORCID: 0000-0002-4449-0131, Ayomoh, Francis Ifeanyi, Abejirinde, Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade, Banke-Thomas, Oluwasola, Eboreime, Ejemai Amaize and Ameh, Charles Anawo (2021) Cost of utilising maternal health Services in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 10 (9). pp. 564-577. ISSN 2322-5939 (Print), 2322-5939 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.104)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Author's published manuscript)
34169_BANKE_THOMAS_Cost_of_utilising_maternal_health.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Cost is a major barrier to maternal health service utilisation for many women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, comparable evidence of the available cost data in these countries is limited. We conducted a systematic review and comparative analysis of costs of utilising maternal health services in these settings.
Methods: We searched peer-reviewed and grey literature databases for articles reporting cost of utilising maternal health services in LMICs published post-2000. All retrieved records were screened and articles meeting the inclusion criteria selected. Quality assessment was performed using the relevant cost-specific criteria of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. To guarantee comparability, disaggregated costs data were inflated to 2019 US dollar equivalents. Total adjusted costs and cost drivers associated with utilising each service were systematically compared. Where heterogeneity in methods or non-disaggregated costs was observed, narrative synthesis was used to summarise findings.
Results: Thirty-six studies met our inclusion criteria. Many of the studies costed multiple services. However, the most frequently costed services were utilisation of normal vaginal delivery (22 studies), caesarean delivery (13), and antenatal care (ANC) (10). The least costed services were post-natal care (PNC) and post-abortion care (PAC) (5 each). Studies used varied methods for data collection and analysis and their quality ranged from low to high with most assessed as average or high. Generally, across all included studies, cost of utilisation progressively increased from ANC and PNC to delivery and PAC, and from public to private providers. Medicines and diagnostics were main cost drivers for ANC and PNC while cost drivers were variable for delivery. Women experienced financial burden of utilising maternal health services and also had to pay some unofficial costs to access care, even where formal exemptions existed.
Conclusion: Consensus regarding approach for costing maternal health services will help to improve their relevance for supporting policy-making towards achieving universal health coverage. If indeed the post-2015 mission of the global community is to “leave no one behind,” then we need to ensure that women and their families are not facing unnecessary and unaffordable costs that could potentially tip them into poverty.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Maternal Health, Utilisation, Cost, Economic Evaluation, Developing Countries
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HG Finance
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Related URLs:
Last Modified: 23 Nov 2021 15:32
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
Selected for GREAT 2019: None
Selected for REF2021: None
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/34169

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics