Skip navigation

Measuring research impact: a large cancer research funding programme in Australia

Measuring research impact: a large cancer research funding programme in Australia

Bowden, Jacqueine A., Sargent, Nicole, Wesselingh, Steve, Size, Lincoln, Donovan, Claire ORCID: 0000-0002-6105-7794 and Miller, Caroline L. (2018) Measuring research impact: a large cancer research funding programme in Australia. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16:39. ISSN 1478-4505 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0311-3)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Open Access Article)
28875 DONOVAN_Measuring_Research_Impact_A_Large_Cancer_Research_Funding_Programme_(OA)_2018.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (881kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background
Measuring research impact is of critical interest to philanthropic and government funding agencies interested in ensuring that the research they fund is both scientifically excellent and has meaningful impact into health and other outcomes. The Beat Cancer Project (BCP) is a AUD $34 m cancer research funding scheme that commenced in 2011. It was initiated by an Australian charity (Cancer Council SA), and supported by the South Australian Government and the state’s major universities.

Methods
This study applied Buxton and Hanney’s Payback Framework to assess research impact generated from the BCP after 3 years of funding. Data sources were an audit of peer-reviewed publications from January 2011 to September 2014 from Web of Knowledge and a self-report survey of investigators awarded BCP research funding during its first 3 years of implementation (2011–2013). Of the 104 surveys, 92 (88%) were completed.

Results
The BCP performed well across all five categories of the Payback Framework. In terms of knowledge production, 1257 peer-reviewed publications were generated and the mean impact factor of publishing journals increased annually. There were many benefits to future research with 21 respondents (23%) reporting career advancement, and 110 higher degrees obtained or expected (including 84 PhDs). Overall, 52% of funded projects generated tools for future research. The funded research attracted substantial further income yielding a very high rate of leverage. For every AUD $1 that the cancer charity invested, the BCP gained an additional AUD $6.06. Five projects (5%) had informed policy and 5 (5%) informed product development, with an additional 31 (34%) and 35 (38%) projects, respectively, anticipating doing so. In terms of health and sector and broader economic benefits, 8 (9%) projects had influenced practice or behaviour of health staff and 32 (34%) would reportedly to do so in the future.

Conclusions
Research impact was a priority of charity and government funders and led to a deliberate funding strategy. Emphasising research impact while maintaining rigorous, competitive processes can achieve the joint objectives of excellence in research, yielding good research impact and a high rate of leverage for philanthropic and public investment, as indicated by these early results.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cancer, payback framework, impact, research
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Department of Education & Community Studies
Last Modified: 15 Jul 2020 11:12
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
Selected for GREAT 2019: None
Selected for REF2021: REF 6
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/28875

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics