Skip navigation

Evaluation of the impact of National Breast Cancer Foundation-funded research

Evaluation of the impact of National Breast Cancer Foundation-funded research

Donovan, Claire ORCID: 0000-0002-6105-7794, Butler, Linda, Butt, Alison J., Jones, Teresa H. and Hanney, Stephen R. (2014) Evaluation of the impact of National Breast Cancer Foundation-funded research. Medical Journal of Australia, 200 (4). pp. 214-218. ISSN 0025-729X (Print), 1326-5377 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.5694/mja13.10798)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Publisher's PDF)
28861 DONOVAN_Evaluation_of_the_Impact_of_NBCF_Research_2014.pdf - Published Version

Download (231kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective:
To evaluate the impact of the National Breast Cancer Foundation’s (NBCF’s) research investment.

Design and participants:
Surveys based on the Payback Framework were sent to chief investigators involved in research funded by the NBCF during 1995–2012; a bibliometric analysis of NBCF-funded publications in 2006–2010 was conducted; and a purposive, stratified sample of case studies was obtained.

Main outcome measures:
Research impact on knowledge production, the research system, informing policy, product development and broader health and economic benefits.

Results:
Of 242 surveys sent, 153 (63%) were returned. The average impact of journals in which NBCF publications appeared was double that of world publications. Seventy surveys (46%) reported career progression, and 185 higher degrees were obtained or expected, including 121 PhDs. One hundred and one grants (66%) produced tools that built capacity across the research system, and research teams leveraged an additional $1.40 in funding for every dollar invested. Fifteen applied grants and one basic grant impacted on policy. Ten basic and four applied grants led to the development of drugs, prognostic tools or diagnostic technologies. Twenty applied and two basic grants led to changes in practice and behaviour of health care staff, consumers and the public, with further impacts anticipated. Case studies provided illustrations of high impact.

Conclusions:
NBCF’s strategy of investing in a mixed portfolio of research areas and mechanisms encouraged a broad range of impacts across all Payback categories. The impacts from basic research tended to focus on knowledge production and drug development; while applied research generated greater impacts within the other Payback categories. The funding of shared infrastructure stimulated impact across the research system.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Research evaluation; Research impact; Payback Framework; Breast cancer; National Breast Cancer Foundation
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Department of Education & Community Studies
Last Modified: 17 Jul 2020 11:07
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
Selected for GREAT 2019: None
Selected for REF2021: REF 2
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/28861

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics