Skip navigation

Predictive cues and spatial attentional bias for alcohol: manipulations of cue-outcome mapping

Predictive cues and spatial attentional bias for alcohol: manipulations of cue-outcome mapping

Gladwin, Thomas E., Banic, Milena, Figner, Bernd and Vink, Matthijs (2019) Predictive cues and spatial attentional bias for alcohol: manipulations of cue-outcome mapping. Addictive Behaviors, 103:106247. ISSN 0306-4603 (doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106247)

[img] PDF (Author's Accepted Manuscript)
27653 GLADWIN_Predictive_Cues_And_Spatial_Attentional_Bias_For_Alcohol_(AAM)_2019.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 30 May 2021.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (335kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that cues predicting the outcome of attentional shifts provide a measure of anticipatory alcohol-related attentional bias that is correlated with risky drinking and has high reliability. However, this is complicated by potential contributions of visual features of cues to reliability, unrelated to their predictive value. Further, little is known of the sensitivity of the bias to variations in cue-outcome mapping manipulations, limiting our theoretical and methodological knowledge: Does the bias robustly follow varying cue-outcome mappings, or are there automatic cue-related associative processes involved? The current studies aimed to address these issues. Participants performed variations of the cued Visual Probe Task (cVPT) in which cues were non-predictive; in which there were multiple cue pairs, used simultaneously and serially; and in which the cue-outcome mapping was reversed. The major findings were, first, that previously found reliability cannot be attributed to aspects of the cues not related to outcome-prediction; second, that reliability of the bias does not survive deviations from a simple, consistent cue-outcome mapping; third, that all predictive versions of the task showed a bias towards alcohol; fourth, that the bias did not simply follow awareness of the cue-outcome mapping; and finally, that only in the case of simultaneous multiple cue pairs, an association with risky drinking was replicated. The results provide support for the reliability of the anticipatory attentional bias for alcohol, suggest that relatively persistent associative processes underlie the bias in the alcohol context, and provide a foundation for future work using the cVPT.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: alcohol, attention, attentional bias, reliability, anticipatory, cued
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Faculty / Department / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Mental Health
Last Modified: 08 Oct 2020 14:57
Selected for GREAT 2016: None
Selected for GREAT 2017: None
Selected for GREAT 2018: None
Selected for GREAT 2019: None
Selected for REF2021: None
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/27653

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics