Skip navigation

Communication between healthcare providers and communicatively-vulnerable patients with associated health outcomes: a scoping review of knowledge syntheses

Communication between healthcare providers and communicatively-vulnerable patients with associated health outcomes: a scoping review of knowledge syntheses

Jenstad, Lorienne, Howe, Tami, Breau, Genevieve Marie, Abel, Jennifer, Colozzo, Paola, Halas, Gayle, Mason, Glenda, Rieger, Caroline, Simon, Leora and Strachan, Shaelyn (2023) Communication between healthcare providers and communicatively-vulnerable patients with associated health outcomes: a scoping review of knowledge syntheses. Patient Education and Counseling (PEC), 119:108040. pp. 1-18. ISSN 0738-3991 (Print), 1873-5134 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2023.108040)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Publisher VoR)
44695_BREAU_ Communication_between_healthcare_providers_and_communicatively_vulnerable_patients.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective: Summarize literature on provider-patient communication linked to health outcomes in communicatively-vulnerable patient populations.
Methods: Scoping review of reviews: systematically searched six databases. Inclusion criteria: systematic searches and syntheses of literature, one or more providers and communicatively-vulnerable patients, synchronous in-person communication, intermediate or health outcome linked to communication.
Results: The search yielded 14,614 citations; 47 reviews – with wide range of providers, communication vulnerabilities, communication practices, and health outcomes – met inclusion criteria. Methodology included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches. Quality ranged from very low to high. Six categories of communication practices linked to health outcomes were identified: 1) motivation-based; 2) accommodation of language, culture, gender, sexual identity, and other concordance with the patient; 3) cultural adaptations of interventions; 4) use of interpreters; 5) other provider-patient communication practices; 6) patient communication practices.
Conclusion: Communication practices were studied in a wide range of providers, with common themes regarding best practices. A unique finding is the role of the patient’s communication practices. The specificity of communication practices studied is heterogeneous, with many reviews providing insufficient details.
Practice Implications: Motivation-based practices and culturally- and linguistically-appropriate care have impacts on patient outcomes across a range of settings with different professions and communicatively-vulnerable groups.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: communicatively-vulnerable; scoping review; provider-patient communication; health outcomes
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > Institute for Lifecourse Development > Centre for Professional Workforce Development
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences > School of Human Sciences (HUM)
Last Modified: 23 Nov 2023 10:38
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/44695

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics