Skip navigation

Family firm network strategies in regional clusters: evidence from Italy

Family firm network strategies in regional clusters: evidence from Italy

Ghinoi, Stefano ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9857-4736, De Vita, Riccardo, Steiner, Bodo and Sinatra, Alessandro (2023) Family firm network strategies in regional clusters: evidence from Italy. Small Business Economics. ISSN 0921-898X (Print), 1573-0913 (Online) (doi:10.1007/s11187-023-00755-5)

[thumbnail of Publisher VoR]
Preview
PDF (Publisher VoR)
39117_GHINOI_Family_firm_network_strategies_in_regional_clusters.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Knowledge networks in regional clusters are fundamental to support innovation and local development. Within clusters, family firms are key in creating business opportunities and supporting the establishment of inter-organizational networks. Yet, their role within regional clusters for knowledge transfers is still not well understood, especially in comparison with non-family firms. This paper applies Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) to network data collected from the Parabiago cluster, one of the most important Italian footwear clusters, to contribute to a better understanding of the network strategies of family firms. We identify distinct network strategies associated with the cluster firms, accounting for different knowledge exchange types: technological, market, and managerial. In our modelling, we control for firm-level attributes and dyadic-level attributes, such as geographical distance and cognitive proximity between cluster firms. Our results suggest that the proneness of family firms to grow networks is highly robust relative to non-family firm relationships, irrespective of knowledge types being exchanged. Moreover, family firms tend to establish connections with other family firms, showing the presence of homophily in their networking approach; however, non-family firms are rather different, since they do not have the same homophilous approach when it comes to exchange knowledge with other non-family firms. These results indicate that the nature of ownership is driving knowledge exchange differences. This key feature of family-only relationships in clusters may help managers and policymakers in devising more effective and targeted cluster strategies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: knowledge network; family firm; regional cluster; social network analysis; ERGM
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Business
Faculty of Business > Department of Systems Management & Strategy
Faculty of Business > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC)
Faculty of Business > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC) > Centre for Business Network Analysis (CBNA)
Greenwich Business School > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC)
Related URLs:
Last Modified: 02 Dec 2024 15:55
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/39117

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics