Saatchi, Ameneh Ghazal, Pallotti, Francesca and Sullivan, Paul (2023) Network approaches and interventions in healthcare settings: a systematic scoping review. PLoS ONE, 18 (2):e0282050. ISSN 1932-6203 (Online) (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0282050)

Preview	PDF (Open Access Article) 38548_PALLOTTI_Network_approaches_and_interventions_in_healthcare_(OA)_2023.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (995kB) | Preview
Preview	PDF (AAM) 38548_PALLOTTI_Network_approaches_and_interventions_in_healthcare.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (555kB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction
The growing interest in networks of interactions is sustained by the conviction that they can be leveraged to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery systems. Evidence in support of this conviction, however, is mostly based on descriptive studies. Systematic evaluation of the outcomes of network interventions in healthcare settings is still wanting. Despite the proliferation of studies based on Social Network Analysis (SNA) tools and techniques, we still know little about how intervention programs aimed at altering existing patterns of social interaction among healthcare providers affect the quality of service delivery. We update and extend prior reviews by providing a comprehensive assessment of available evidence.

Methods and findings
We searched eight databases to identify papers using SNA in healthcare settings published between 1st January 2010 and 1st May 2022. We followed Chambers et al.’s (2012) approach, using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We distinguished between studies relying on SNA as part of an intervention program, and studies using SNA for descriptive purposes only. We further distinguished studies recommending a possible SNA-based intervention. We restricted our focus on SNA performed on networks among healthcare professionals (e.g., doctors, nurses, etc.) in any healthcare setting (e.g., hospitals, primary care, etc.). Our final review included 102 papers. The majority of the papers used SNA for descriptive purposes only. Only four studies adopted SNA as an intervention tool, and measured outcome variables.

Conclusions
We found little evidence for SNA-based intervention programs in healthcare settings. We discuss the reasons and challenges, and identify the main component elements of a network intervention plan. Future research should seek to evaluate the long-term role of SNA in changing practices, policies and behaviors, and provide evidence of how these changes affect patients and the quality of service delivery.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	social network analysis; network intervention; healthcare professionals; healthcare settings
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD61 Risk Management R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Business Faculty of Business > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC) Faculty of Business > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC) > Centre for Business Network Analysis (CBNA) Greenwich Business School > Networks and Urban Systems Centre (NUSC)
Last Modified:	02 Dec 2024 15:56
URI:	http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/38548

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads