Skip navigation

Staff perspectives on barriers to and facilitators of quality of life, health, wellbeing, recovery and reduced risk for older forensic mental-health patients: a qualitative interview study

Staff perspectives on barriers to and facilitators of quality of life, health, wellbeing, recovery and reduced risk for older forensic mental-health patients: a qualitative interview study

Walker, Kate, Yates, Jen, Dening, Tom, Völlm, Birgit, Tomlin, Jack ORCID: 0000-0002-7610-7918 and Griffiths, Chris (2022) Staff perspectives on barriers to and facilitators of quality of life, health, wellbeing, recovery and reduced risk for older forensic mental-health patients: a qualitative interview study. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 27 (4). pp. 287-300. ISSN 1355-8196 (Print), 1758-1060 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196221094512)

[img]
Preview
PDF (AAM)
38114_TOMLIN_Staff_perspectives_on_barriers_to_and_facilitators_of_quality_of_life_health_wellbeing.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (547kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (AAM)
38114_TOMLIN_Staff_perspectives_on_barriers_to_and_facilitators_of_quality_of_life_health_wellbeing_recovery_and_reduced_risk.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (273kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives
There is a lack of research informing service delivery for older forensic mental health patients. This study explored service provision in forensic mental health inpatient and community services in England, investigating what is required for progress in terms of quality of life, health, wellbeing, recovery and reduced risk, and the barriers and facilitators associated with this.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 48 members of staff working with older forensic mental health patients in secure inpatient units or the community in England. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Results
Two global themes ‘What works’ and ‘What doesn’t work’ were identified comprising themes representing environmental, interpersonal and individual factors. ‘What works’ included: positive social support and relationships; individualised holistic patient-centred care; hub and spoke approach to patient care; and suitable environments. ‘What doesn’t work’ included: absence of/or maladaptive relationships with family and friends; gaps in service provision; and unsuitable environments.
Conclusions
For older patients to progress to improved quality of life, health, wellbeing and reduced risk, multilevel and comprehensive support is required, comprising a range of services, interventions, and multidisciplinary input, and individualised to each patient’s needs. The physical environment needs to be adapted for older patients and provide a social environment that seeks to include supportive families, friends and expert professional input. A clear patient progression pathway is required; this must be reflected in policy and provision.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: forensic mental health; older patients; service provision
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD61 Risk Management
K Law > K Law (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences
Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences > School of Law & Criminology (LAC)
Last Modified: 27 Oct 2023 07:56
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/38114

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics