Skip navigation

The socioeconomics of genetically modified biofortified crops: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The socioeconomics of genetically modified biofortified crops: a systematic review and meta-analysis

De Steur, Hans, Wesana, Joshua ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1970-6241, Blancquaert, Dieter, Van Der Straeten, Dominique and Gellynck, Xavier (2016) The socioeconomics of genetically modified biofortified crops: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1390 (1). pp. 14-33. ISSN 0077-8923 (Print), 1749-6632 (Online) (doi:10.1111/nyas.13199)

[thumbnail of Author Accepted Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Author Accepted Manuscript)
28390 WESANA The_Socioeconomics_of_Genetically_Modified_Biofortified_Crops_2016.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (908kB) | Preview

Abstract

Building upon the growing interest and research on genetically modified (GM) biofortification, its socioeconomic potential has been increasingly examined. We conducted two systematic reviews and meta-analyses to provide comprehensive evidence of consumers' willingness to pay (11 economic valuation studies, 64 estimates) and cost-effectiveness/benefits (five economic evaluation studies, 30 estimates). Worldwide, consumers were willing to pay 23.9% more for GM biofortified food crops. Aside from crop and design-related differences, information provision was deemed crucial. Positive information (nutrition and GM benefits) is associated with the highest consumer willingness to pay, compared with negative, objective, and conflicting GM information, especially when negative information was mentioned last. This health intervention would reduce the aggregated micronutrient deficiency burden in Asia (15.6 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)) by 12.5-51.4%, at a low cost of USD 7.9-27.8 per DALY in a pessimistic and optimistic scenario, respectively. Given that GM biofortified crops could tackle hidden hunger in a cost-effective and well-accepted way, its implementation is worth pursuing. A case study on folate biofortification further elaborates on the importance of socioeconomic research and the determinants of their market potential.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost-effectiveness, folate-biofortified rice, genetic modification, golden rice, willingness to pay
Subjects: S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group: Faculty of Engineering & Science
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute
Faculty of Engineering & Science > Natural Resources Institute > Food & Markets Department
Last Modified: 29 Jul 2020 12:58
URI: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/28390

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics