Farrall, Stephen, Hunter, Ben, Sharpe, Gilly and Calverley, Adam (2015) What ‘works’ when retracing sample members in a qualitative longitudinal study? Journal International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19 (3). pp. 287-300. ISSN 1364-5579 (Print), 1464-5300 (Online) (doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.993839)

Preview

PDF (Publisher's PDF) 23828 HUNTER_What_Works_When_Retracing_Sample_Members_(OA)_2015.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (436kB) | Preview

Abstract

Attrition represents a significant obstacle to overcome in any longitudinal research project. It is, perhaps, most keenly felt when the data collected are from a qualitative study, since, unlike quantitative longitudinal research, weighting factors cannot be applied to ‘correct’ for any biases in the achieved sample and even a small number of ‘lost’ respondents can equate to a large percentage of the original sample. It is perhaps because of qualitative longitudinal research’s (QLR) reliance on, generally speaking, smaller samples that few have been able to shed much light on which re-contacting procedures are associated with achieving higher rates of retention. In this article, using data from a fifth sweep of a larger but particularly challenging cohort of 199 former probationers, we explore the strategies which helped us maintain high levels of retention in a QLR study. The article contains many practical suggestions which others planning or undertaking similar studies may find useful.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
Uncontrolled Keywords:	qualitative longitudinal research (QLR); retention; follow-up studies
Subjects:	K Law > KD England and Wales
Faculty / School / Research Centre / Research Group:	Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences > Crime, Law & (In)Security Research Group (CLS) Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences > School of Law & Criminology (LAC)
Related URLs:	Publisher
Last Modified:	05 Jun 2019 16:23
URI:	http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/23828

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads